There is no need to make personal and disparaging comments about my professional standards, about which you know nothing. That is a low blow, even for you, but I am used to these below the belt comments from you, and will not rise to them by reporting your post - something I have never done on here other than for spam posts.
I have asked a simple question, which is not out of context, so no, I don't understand your resistance to answering it. Whenever these discussions happen you refer to how (in your opinion) sticking to the two sexes that have served people well for centuries would require genital examination, and that butch women would be questioned about their sex at every turn. I genuinely don't see how that would be the case, as it hasn't happened yet, as far as I know.
Nor do I know which 'inaccuracies' you are accusing me of believing. Sex is recorded on passports. People are delineated by sex in everyday life. It is done by acceptance that people are who they say they are, unless there is good reason for someone to be questioned. This would only happen under very rare circumstances (I am struggling to think of any) and even then, they would be asked for documentation such as a birth certificate or passport, rather than a physical examination.
Preston Davey, another baby P.


