Gransnet forums

Health

NHS paying for staff to have access to private health

(29 Posts)
Glorianny Sun 05-Jun-22 10:04:58

Well it may not be ethical but it is probably the only way to keep any sort of an NHS service operational. With huge staff shortages any sickness leave will impact massively on what can be done. The other alternative is I suppose to let them linger on waiting lists, close wards and shut down services. It's the result of massive under funding .

Casdon Sun 05-Jun-22 10:03:29

You need to attach the report Sago, the Telegraph is behind a paywall so people can’t see the article in full to enable them to comment with the facts at their disposal?

dragonfly46 Sun 05-Jun-22 10:03:03

Probably makes sense as the sooner NHS staff are treated the sooner they are back on the job!

Sago Sun 05-Jun-22 09:58:26

From todays Telegraph;

NHS trusts are using taxpayers’ money to fund private medical tests and treatment for staff while patients languish on record waiting lists, The Telegraph can disclose.

Hospitals and ambulance trusts are paying for employees to undergo private care ranging from MRI scans to physiotherapy and psychiatric care in London’s Harley Street.

In one case, a firm providing private physiotherapy to hospital staff in Hertfordshire said it had won the business because the trust wanted employees to get treatment “much more quickly” than the 14-week wait facing NHS patients.

Employees referred to the private company for treatment “receive an appointment within an average of 2.6 days”, the firm said. In another case, a hospital spent thousands of pounds on private health insurance for staff.

The funding means NHS staff will be seen more quickly than many members of the public waiting for equivalent tests or treatment from the health service. It was revealed in data obtained by Baker Kell Cumming, a political intelligence firm, from some 50 trusts.

Is this ethical?