Fair comment, Marydoll, but the poster actually posed the question: "Mild cognitive impairment?", and then described behaviour that was far from mild, and potentially lethal. The natural rejoinder was to suggest what it MIGHT be, and to use that possibility to emphasise what should happen next. For me, playing it down was not an option here. However, I accept that some responses may have been rather too black and white, but many others, myself included, were careful to use "sounds like", "could be", in their advice. I also think virtually everyone said that the diagnosis should be made by a Doctor. So I'm certainly not "shooting you down", and appreciate that the topic is rather close to home for you, but it's also true to say that none of us claimed to be Doctors, and any advice was given with the best of intentions. As regards "not knowing" the individual concerned, surely that applies to every case described here on GN, but that doesn't mean that constructive advice can't be given. If that were the case, what would be the point of GN anyway?