Gransnet forums

News & politics

'The thug in police uniform'. (Daily Mail today)

(183 Posts)
Greatnan Fri 20-Jul-12 07:40:06

It is not often I find myself agreeing with the DM, but today they detail the shocking 'career' of PC Simon Harwood who was cleared of causing the death of Ian Tomlinson. The jury were not allowed to hear about the ten complaints against Harwood, who was allowed to leave one force on 'medical grounds' (such as?) before a disciplinary hearing could be held. He was then allowed to join another force and the senior police officer in charge yesterday admitted that their vetting procedure had not been adequate.
The charges against him include punching and racially abusing a 14-year old girl, abuse of authority and using unnecessary force. He admitted going into 'red mist mode'.
Ian Tomlinson's family now plan to sue him in civil court where the burden of proof is less and the judge will know Harwood's record.

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 13:08:19

Whats with the coyness Amelianne ?

absentgrana Fri 20-Jul-12 12:59:44

Oh for heaven's sake. It's not the least bit important when someone joined Gransnet and, of course, any member may post on any subject with any opinion at a time of their choosing. I don't think anyone is suggesting that an opinion differing from what seems to be a consensus shouldn't be expressed. I should be horrified if they were. For all that, I still think your view is mistaken ameliaanne.

ameliaanne Fri 20-Jul-12 12:53:50

Does that make a difference?

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 12:52:19

Not at all , anyone can post , however , you haven"t answered question about whether you are a new postergrin

ameliaanne Fri 20-Jul-12 12:46:42

Greatnan and Nonu, are you saying that if someone has a different opinion from the majority on here, they shouldn't be posting? It does seem like that. My remark about the media coverage on the family was indeed nothing to do with the trial and I should have posted it separately.

crimson Fri 20-Jul-12 12:37:50

I feel it's a case of the police force 'looking after their own' when, in fact they should be looking after us. Disgraceful.

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 12:14:30

Come on girls "nail your colours to the mast"

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 12:08:38

Are they "Newbies" ? confused

Greatnan Fri 20-Jul-12 12:06:46

AmeliaAnn and AnneMaria - I can't find any other posts for either of you.What a coincidence if you should both have felt moved to post for the first time on this subject. Apart from yourselves, there does not seem to be much controversy.

Anagram Fri 20-Jul-12 12:05:06

It would appear to me that it is!

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 11:54:20

Oh come on !

AnneMaria Fri 20-Jul-12 11:53:25

It seems like everyone has an opinion and it's one side or the other. And it would appear that this is not a straight forward of right versus wrong actions.

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 11:53:24

Well said !

Greatnan Fri 20-Jul-12 11:51:14

What on earth has Mr. Tomlinson's family relationships got to do with the case, other than to try to prove in some way that he deserved to be killed?
No, we don't have to have been in the police force to know that hitting an unarmed person from behind is wrong. Mr. Tomlinson posed no threat to any policeman or member of the public. Perhaps he was a bit annoying, but that hardly deserves the violence of the attack.
Even Harwood himself admitted to experiencing a 'red mist' - is that the type of person we want policing the streets?
Whether or not the jury knew of his past record, we know it now, so I am amazed that anybody would try to support him.

Nonu Fri 20-Jul-12 11:49:02

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm !!!!!

ameliaanne Fri 20-Jul-12 11:44:42

I think that until any of us have done the job we cannot totally understand.

absentgrana Fri 20-Jul-12 11:11:35

Nevertheless, the coroner's judgement was that Mr Tomlinson was unlawfully killed. Bit of a paradox there.

Greatnan Fri 20-Jul-12 11:10:38

So, can we take it you think PC Harwood is a shining example of a good policeman?

ameliaanne Fri 20-Jul-12 11:02:17

Harwood's trial was on this case alone just as it should be in any trial. The jury found him not guilty. Police have complaints made against them all the time because of the nature of the job and the people they deal with. And all this lovey-dovey sentiment from Tomlinson's family - he was homeless for 13 years - where were they all then? Oh yes. It all sells newspapers.

absentgrana Fri 20-Jul-12 10:54:07

Greatnan I think the first pathologist has actually been suspended, but not over this case so his opinion has to be considered as professional and valid as the second one.

Greatnan Fri 20-Jul-12 10:50:09

I will have to go back and check, but I think the pathologist used was somewhat dodgy anyway and the family had to ask for another post mortem.
Harwood has been on 'gardening' leave on full pay ever since the incident!

absentgrana Fri 20-Jul-12 10:44:56

I think some of the problem may lie with the discrepancy in the pathologists' opinions, not helped by the fact the the first pathologist disposed of some evidence after his examination. The suggestion is that because of Mr Tomlinson's alcoholism, the pushing, blow to the leg and the fall may not have been the actual cause or even an aggravating factor – beyond reasonable doubt. It's one of those occasions where one wishes that the jury hadn't perhaps been quite so scrupulous.

ravenmad Fri 20-Jul-12 10:39:39

From the video it is clear that Mr Tomlinson was knocked down for no reason at all. How on earth could they come up with a not guilty verdict. If this had been the other way around and it was a policeman killed, I'm sure we would have seen another verdict.

absentgrana Fri 20-Jul-12 10:26:09

For once in my life, words fail me. angry

AlieOxon Fri 20-Jul-12 10:23:52

Sounds just like the Catholic method of moving guilty priests sideways out of the way....the system covering up...