What on earth has Mr. Tomlinson's family relationships got to do with the case, other than to try to prove in some way that he deserved to be killed?
No, we don't have to have been in the police force to know that hitting an unarmed person from behind is wrong. Mr. Tomlinson posed no threat to any policeman or member of the public. Perhaps he was a bit annoying, but that hardly deserves the violence of the attack.
Even Harwood himself admitted to experiencing a 'red mist' - is that the type of person we want policing the streets?
Whether or not the jury knew of his past record, we know it now, so I am amazed that anybody would try to support him.