BAnanas I have joined this thread late on but here is my penny's worth. Cyprus it seems is a peculiar case in as much that there was a raft of fundamental flaws in its administration and one of those was the burying ones head in the sand hoping the problem will go away approach. In regards to money laundering, the government's only response to those seeking answers to questions was that they would consult with the authorities in Russia to determine facts before responding. Russia of course being the suspects in the money laundering allegations. I think I am right in saying that the Island joined the EU in the hope that EU partners would instruct Turkey to end its occupation of the Northern part. It did not address its currency valuation which probably should have been devalued by some 30% or so in order to maintain a competitive edge in its prime industry - tourism. That failure alone has decimated tourism in respect of what was its largest market - Britain and North European countries not in the Eurozone. In addition Cyprus had and still has a bloated Public and Civil Service whose staff are very highly paid and in disproportion to average earnings.
Many other anomolies were, and some still are, in existence such as charging import duties on vehicles imported from other EU states a malpractise that earns more than the fines imposed for doing so and the system which denies individuals title deeds to property they have paid for in full and permits developers to mortgage the home the home that has been paid for in full rendering it Bank's property. All these and many more examples of maladministration not least the payment of very high rates of interest on bank deposits and exceptionally low rates of corporation tax coupled with a reluctance to pay income tax (the system is similar to that in Greece where tax is not taken at source as in PAYE but individuals are invited to declare earnings in order to be taxed - Who in their right mind would?) has led to a massive deficit. Awarding public and Civil Servants a 13th Salary and biannual COLA (cost of living allowance) effectively giving employees a rise in salary twice a year to counteract the effects of inflation. Alongside all this the main utilities and national carrier are state owned and subsidised or solvent due to excessive charges to the consumer.
All this obviously led to a catastrophic failure in finances - unsurprisingly, and the option to secure a bailout similar to others was unsustainable and a non starter. The country would never have been able to pay it back so the option to top slice bank deposits over €100K was arrived at. I personally don't agree with the principle as it sets a dangerous precedent but I don't think there was an alternative given government intransigence in other areas of suggested cuts. The decision will be challenged in the courts I am sure but it must be remembered that it was not the government who imposed the 'haircut' it was the Troika as a condition of the bailout of some €10billion. The alternative would have been bankruptcy, reversion to the CY£ vastly devalued and an almost impossible capacity to service existing loans. A preferable option perhaps to the current and future outlook as in my humble opinion the writing is on the wall and a further bailout may be required in a few years. Property prices are already tumbling, unemployment is rising and foodstuff prices are disproportionately high. British expats are suffering as a result although some have only themselves to blame for trying to make a fast buck and taking out swiss franc mortgages without understanding the implications but overall a sorry state of affairs which in my opinion is waiting to be repeated in a country near you soon!
Good Morning Wednesday 13th May 2026
Is Mumsnet down today (13th May)




