Gransnet forums

News & politics

Stop children accessing porn & violence

(12 Posts)
j08 Wed 03-Jul-13 09:23:24

Actually, the child would probably be the one most able to do it! grin

j08 Wed 03-Jul-13 09:22:49

Yes. Most devices which the makers know will be used by children, have parental controls. How difficult they are to set is another matter.

shysal Wed 03-Jul-13 09:19:40

I heard the end of an item on the radio news yesterday. I think they were saying that some internet providers were going to provide a 'clean screen' service with an opt-in for 'adult' content. Makes sense, but how easy it will be to put into place I don't know.

j08 Tue 02-Jul-13 18:51:16

Like you say Cecilia, the only answer at the moment is vigilance on the parents' part.

At what age is it ok to give a child an internet device I wonder. Grandson's birthday coming up and he wants a Nexus 7 for books and games. But it also means the internet would be available.

It's not easy.

j08 Tue 02-Jul-13 18:47:59

Not that I would have wanted anything else!!!! Just curious!

j08 Tue 02-Jul-13 18:47:17

I only got wildlife pictures. confused

Deedaa Tue 02-Jul-13 17:34:15

My son has a bird book by Bill Oddie. In it Bill warns people not to try googling Wildlife because they will be VERY surprised at what they find.

Elegran Tue 02-Jul-13 09:39:21

Also words like "Middlesex" !

FlicketyB Tue 02-Jul-13 09:31:52

Trouble is with word based systems, is they usually work on strings of letters rather than separate words. DH has found on one mailing list he contributes to that you cannot use the word 'snigger', it will be removed and with tongue in cheek he made a reference to 'Scunthorpe' and had that removed as well.

Cecilia1963 Mon 01-Jul-13 14:17:20

Hi Absent.

Yes ... Sadly, think you are right. Had very similar response on Mumsnet forum. And, just finished reading piece in yesterday's Observer, saying exactly the same thing - ending 'this will run and run'. Filters, vigilance and education, I guess are our best hopes.

Thanks for replying!

absent Mon 01-Jul-13 00:29:33

So what would you suggest should be the "trigger" words for the knife-wielding man on YouTube? It's very difficult to think of what could be used without unnecessary interference with perfectly innocent material - a chef demonstrating how to fillet a fish, for example - or being so specific as to be pretty much useless.

Of course I am not in favour of children accessing porn, whether the sexual or violent variety or both. In fact, I am not in favour of porn of any sort. I just think this would prove to be impossible. Look at the difficulties the US has had with trigger words in e-mails.

Cecilia1963 Sun 30-Jun-13 23:16:28

There's been much talk about porn and how to protect our children from accidentally stumbling across the most vicious, violent stuff online. And it's not just porn that children can too easily access. My thirteen year old son was sent a link by a Facebook school friend to a video depicting a man wielding a knife to cut off a woman's head. This clip was taken down by YouTube, but only after thousands of young teenagers had seen it. No one, not even our Big Internet Players, seem to have any bright ideas.

So, how about this? The Big Internet Players should automatically block a range of certain words if they're attached to photos or images, and access only gained through a credit card. So, access to porn and violence – anything that would be X-rated (or even removed) from films/DVDs, is blocked for under 18s.

I'm not sure how feasible this is, and I'm sure it would need loads of fine-tuning, but it can't be completely impossible, if the will is there. And I don't think it's an infringement of people's rights – it's no different than being asked for your ID if you were buying X-rated films, or alcohol, in a shop.

I know it won't stop everything. Lots of dreadful content is not hosted by Google, YouTube or Facebook. But it would be a start. And take some of the workload off Internet Watch Foundation, leaving them free to concentrate on other, trickier avenues.

So I wanted to run this past the Gransnet Community (and I've asked Mumsnet people, too). See what you all think.

Thank you!
(Sorry if this message is a bit long ...)