Going one step further than the discussion has ever gone before and I am not I assure you making a nasty implication here, can a baby in the womb ever be free of the toxins it's mother gives it?
The reason why I ask?
I have seen women getting their 'fix' of presumably methodone from a chemist, pushing their babies in a pushchair and to be honest I find it quite possibly one of the saddest, liberal thinking disgraces I ever have witnessed. I think liberal freedom is OK but not at the expense of a child's future.
I am not particularly saying the poor girls demise was the product of her mothers lifestyle but I am genuinely asking could it have attributed to the act of destruction she suffered.
I don't know the answer but it is a point in question that society should be debating. We seem to be prioritising the mothers choice of lifestyle over that of the unborn child. I may be totally wrong in asking this question on this thread but I am genuinely concerned about the unborn infants future welfare, not that of the mother who has somehow been given permission from society to behave as she pleases and to hell with the consequences of the unborn child.
I am not a cold hearted person I acknowledge Paula Yates, her mother, suffered from possibly inherited problems of one sort or another. I am truly saddened that two vibrant, beautiful women have apparently lost their life through the curse of addiction to drugs and another demon hopefully most of us will never have to deal with.