Language is a funny old thing isn't it? No one has any right to forbid the use of any terminology at all - unless it contravenes the laws of the land, for example using words which are likely to cause harassment alarm and distress to those who hear it. Sections 4 & 5 of the Public Order Act. But there are many words which, whilst being legal, are unnecessary at best and at worst can be seen to deliberately cause upset to the hearer or reader.
For example, I find the description of women as 'ho's' deeply unpleasant. I dislike the use of the term 'religiacs' and some object to the term 'militant atheist'. We all have a right to use these terms, but in the interests of mutual respect and not wishing to alienate those whose views one might disagree with, it seems to me to better to avoid these usages and conduct debate in mutually respectful terms.
Yes, anyone can be offensive, and lots of people can be offended, sometimes with little cause, but if a person really wants to state their point of view and achieve some meeting of minds, then avoiding inflammatory language would seem to be wise.
I’m a Pear/Apple - Part 5. Still going!!



