I'm afraid that what I am seeing reported is the old parties yet again trying to manipulate things for their own sake.
I heard this morning that we have counties with bigger populations than some US states; why should they not have more of the running of their own areas. Large cities can almost certainly do better for their population than London can.
Some of the politicians raise the point that, in a vote in the North East for an assembly there was a resounding "no". Yet again many of the old parties politicians were negative, telling everyone that it meant another layer of administration. Does it need to be? Perhaps we could build on the councils. The new level could send a number of MPs, proportional to those voted on to their council/assembly, to the UK parliament (situated out of London) from all the UK. England may decide to have a parliament as Scotland does but do we really need one?
I really hope we are seeing the death of the old parties and a grouping system where a "Yorkshire Right" joins with a "London Right" member and others wanting the same ends (obviously this could be left or any other group they stand for) and so on in a group to get what they want for their county/assembly in a UK parliament, regrouping for different needs.
Probably not in my life-time though 
This weather is getting me down. Is it May or March?


I am assuming equal size states/assemblies/counties with an overall parliament to look after the things that must be nation wide.