Gransnet forums

News & politics

A letter to Mr Cameron shared on facebook

(83 Posts)
ayse Sat 09-May-15 11:59:29

Written by a younger person on face book. I thought I would share it with you all.

Dear Prime Minister,

I don't know if you will ever read this, but I have some things I wish to say to you.

You have won the General Election and command a majority in the House of Commons, and as such will feel you have a legitimate mandate to govern. However, you must also know that you don't command a majority of the British people.

Although our political views are very much at odds on many issues, I'm willing to believe that you are a good man, as sure of your ideals as I am of mine, and believe your plan is what's best for us all. You said today that you will govern for the whole country and bring back together that which has clearly fractured. I hope you will.

But Prime Minister, though you can obviously see your party did not win the confidence of Scotland and huge swathes of the north of England, I'm not sure your party quite understands why. It's not because we're all 'loony-left' or extremists and nationalists, it's because so many of us are scared. Scared of what your policies will do to our communities and families. Scared of what will happen to our health service and our schools. Scared of losing our family homes for the sake of a few quid saving from the bedroom tax, or not being able to heat our home and have enough left to buy food.

I don't disagree with you that the best way out of poverty is to work, nor do I think that people should get something for nothing and expect the the tax-payer to support people indefinitely if they are able to work. Who would think that that was ok and fair?

But your party's policies on these issues, couched in terms of reducing the deficit and balancing the books, don't seem to take into account the social and human cost of such actions. The country isn't a business, it's its people. All its people. And you are everyone's Prime Minister whether we voted for you or not.

You said today you will govern for everyone and unite the country. I hope you do. But to be able to do so you need to make it a priority in your first 100 days, to spend time in Scotland visiting people on zero hours contracts. Come to Manchester and talk with those who have been sanctioned for having a spare room, but have nowhere else to go. Go to Liverpool and meet people with disabled dependents who can't afford even one nanny, or to Newcastle and talk to people still living in poverty due to the demise of the coal industry. Spend a week or two living on the minimum wage, or volunteer in a food bank for a whole day.

Then Prime Minister you might begin to understand the cost of your policies from the other side, to see people as more than their net contribution to the economy, or as deliberate drains on the system. If you do that, then maybe you can heal some of the fractures in our society. Without this I just don't believe you can see just how crucial these issues are.

So please Prime Minister, leave Westminster for a few hours a week and truly strive to govern for all of us.

Rev'd Mike Walsh
The United Reformed Church

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 20:46:30

wine

Ana Sat 09-May-15 20:51:45

Even Mumsnet's getting fed up with the political vitriol. I don't post, but I do look in occasionally...

rosequartz Sat 09-May-15 21:12:35

Young, but possibly older than David Cameron?

I expect there will be lots of 'letters' like these and also to constituency MPs.

Are my DC young? If not then I must be ancient.
Oh, OK , I'm old!

rosequartz Sat 09-May-15 21:15:54

I don't know how the builder got rid of affordable housing (social housing) djen. I thought it was a condition of building new houses. It still is here.

rosequartz Sat 09-May-15 21:20:35

My thread has gone upside down [ confused]

rosequartz Sat 09-May-15 21:20:57

Oh ok now!

rosesarered Sat 09-May-15 21:29:34

Rosequartz........ Have you been imbibing?i know I suggested a glass of wine was in order for all of us, but don't have more than three!grin

Tegan Sat 09-May-15 21:30:58

'Don't bother to be sad on my behalf btw. You already have so many family troubles to feel down about. Thankfully I have none. I am truly blessed.'
I'm sorry j, but I do think that was a personal, spiteful comment and I would like you to retract it please.

jinglbellsfrocks Sat 09-May-15 22:51:13

You started it ducks. hmm

durhamjen Sat 09-May-15 23:07:59

I haven't actually noticed any economic recovery, and neither have my kids or grandkids, although I suppose you did say "what little....", Ana.

Ana Sat 09-May-15 23:13:50

You and yours may not have noticed it, durhamjen, but it's a matter of record. You must know that, but are affecting ignorance - I anticipate a link coming up!

rosequartz Sat 09-May-15 23:27:31

put mammon in the place of god
I wasn't aware that any particular party (labour included) had a monopoly on god and never realised that the tories were not religious gracesgran shock

durhamjen Sat 09-May-15 23:33:49

Not the only ones who haven't noticed, Ana.
A link for you, as you asked.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/06/low-pay-high-rent-work-poverty-employment-general-election-chingford

Iain Duncan Smith's constituency has the fifth highest proportion of low-paid workers in the UK, nearly half paid less than a living wage. Fortunately his majority went down to just over 8000 from 13,000.

durhamjen Sat 09-May-15 23:39:13

www.theguardian.com/business/2015/may/01/uk-factory-data-debunks-tory-claims-of-economic-recovery

Another one for you, Ana, if you insist. I bet none of the Tory papers had this in.

Ana Sat 09-May-15 23:45:22

I didn't ask, I just knew you wouldn't be able to resist!

CBA reading Guardian articles at this time of night, although I'm sure some will thank you for the links...smile

durhamjen Sun 10-May-15 00:21:12

I still bet you will not find this in the Telegraph, Times or DM.

nightowl Sun 10-May-15 00:24:26

I will post this link again as well dj even though I got told off for posting it the first time (wrong thread apparently, tut tut, us left wingers must learn our place now it seems).

A real economist talking about the economy, and how we are fed lies by the press.

I don't expect anyone to read it, after all, why bother now?

mainlymacro.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/why-are-conservatives-so-incompetent-at.html?m=1

durhamjen Sun 10-May-15 00:49:10

How rich are you, Ana?

theconversationuk.cmail19.com/t/r-l-azuyhy-iudkikukhu-h/

I only ask because it's only the rich who have had an increased standard of living, according to this article. Just been checking my email, and there it was! Serendipity, for me but not the poor.

whitewave Sun 10-May-15 08:01:27

The sentiment in the letter is why I and all my extended family voted Labour.

In fact none of my family have been touched by the Cameron government in a material way - we are what could be classed as middle class I suppose, although material wealth has never been important to any of us - I guess you could say that having never wanted it is easy to say that.

My children are an environmental scientist and a genetic engineer, my nephew in between a Masters and a PHd the rest of us are either retired on reasonable occupational pensions or still in education.

But and it is a big BUT none of us can accept that a society as rich and mature as ours should allow such an imbalance of wealth and power.
The problem is that listening to people when talking about the state of the nation they talk in newspaper headlines, they are a pervasive influence and undoubtedly a right wing narrative is all that gets aired. As a consequence any possible alternative to the current economic path is drowned out with the many of the population unable to make any form of judgement other than one of ever more austerity and for many hardship

Lilygran Sun 10-May-15 09:01:42

Well said, whitewave! The new electoral map of the UK is quite alarming. It shows quite starkly the extent to which our political views vary regionally. I can't think any government which has got in on the present voting system is going to welcome any change. And I can't think the Tories are going to show a lot of forebearance over their less popular policies when they have been returned so solidly, in spite of having little support in large areas of the country.

soontobe Sun 10-May-15 09:04:27

I didnt realise that so many people still read the paper version of newspapers. I thought that they had somewhat died out.

I have realised from partly on gransnet, and doing a bit of looking into it myself, that the paper versions do indeed have a bit of a right wing bias.
I do think that that is slightly counteracted by the left wing bias of the BBC, but I do now conclude, that in the light of so many people still reading paper newspapers, that the balance is wrong.

Soutra Sun 10-May-15 09:21:53

What do you mean by "paper versions"? Soontobe? I have a subscription to the DT which buys me one "real/hard copy" and online to 2 devices at the same address, so DH and I sit up in bed with our respective iPads while the paper sits on the mat!!
But the content is identical -only missing the ads.

soontobe Sun 10-May-15 09:29:08

paper version [ I meant real/hard copy.

When I started a thread about the DM and its vivid IS pictures, I went out that day or the next and compared it, and about 7 other papers with the online version.
The DM one was radically different. The others, some of which I didnt compare as closely, were different as well, as regards content.
I couldnt do a full and complete search of all 8 of them, as my computer is very slow, and some newspapers, such as the Guardian, and especially the express and one other[forgot which one], is so painfully slow to load, that I give up loading and reading part way through.
The DM is one online version that loads brilliantly compared to others. Which is why I still read it, but not as much as before.
For what it is worth, I should have better somputer access in a few months time. Hoorah!

Ariadne Sun 10-May-15 09:30:27

If the "paper" versions have "a bit of a right wing bias", then surely you'd have to say the same about the online versions, soontobe? I cannot imagine that they are edited for their different readerships!

soontobe Sun 10-May-15 09:31:26

I meant to add, that I have done a couple of brief comaprisons on other days before, and again, they were quite different, from what I saw.
Perhaps the Telegraph isnt.
I think that when I bought the 8 hard print newspapers, there was a Telegraph amongst them.