Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Truth Behind The Deficit.?

(100 Posts)
Parliament100 Mon 06-Jul-15 19:04:02

David Cameron is using the deficit as a cover to dismantle all the social changes that came in under a Labour Government in 1945-48, and there is no opposition to it

The Tory mantra of making painful cuts to reduce the deficit is little more than a smoke screen they hide behind to implement their ideology of reducing the size of the State, driving down wages, cutting benefits ect.

My guess is that they'd make pretty much the same decisions for ideological reasons even if there wasn't a deficit.

The cynic in me says how easy it is for the right wing comfortably well off, greed infested Tory supporters to ridicule and chastise people on the receiving end of Tory cuts in welfare. And how equally easy it is for the right wing press to encourage this, just to sell their papers.

The Thatcherist, hard line, anti social policies the Tory's are forcing on us all makes them feel superior. And they perpetuate the suffering while living in their comfy homes without a conscience.

The Tory's pretend to care about the pensioners having to choose between heating, or eating, the Tory's pretend to care about the family's wondering how they are going to feed their children today and tomorrow.

The Tory's since Thatcher have been the same !

No longer a small "c" left of centre Conservative party with a good social conscience.
No, since the 80's they have been ultra right wing, hardnosed, and with no compassion but to condemn the poor to a life of misery and no hope so long as they can live in relative luxury.

This is how they want it, to keep the masses under their eternal control. The Tories only aim is power and control.

For that reason the Tories love it when the economy is bad, so bad that they blame the masses of poor for it. It is malicious and insidious.

And what makes it even more appalling is that the Tories actually do believe they are superior intellectually to everybody else.

1 million people are now forced to use Food banks in 21st century Britain,

It’s a disgrace, and what’;s worse it all started with Thatcher over 30 years ago when the iron lady started rolling back the State, Cameron is now finishing the job.

POGS Tue 07-Jul-15 11:43:16

smile

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 11:45:11

I am indeed old enough to remember the Thatcher era, and her policies. To answer a couple of postings, Britain will never be bankrupt whilst we can afford to get involved in middle east wars, and send billions to uphold third world countries.

Secondly, those people who openly talk about milking the system as somehow a justification for the Tory right wing to take the entire country back to pre- WW2 days has to be some kind of joke.

When people talk like this about so-called welfare State abusers, it reminds me this was how Hitler started in a mass discrimination against the Jews and other ethnic minorities, and we all know how this mindset manifested itself.

We have not had a "Labour" Government running Britain since the 1970's. Tony Blair's New Labour Government embraced Margaret Thatcher's free market policies, but he did bring in a minimum wage, and he did bring in Pensions Credit for pensioners, and Tax Credits for workers, but the top still had their income taxes cut, and Council tax took over from the Poll Tax.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 12:17:36

nigglynellie, The State pension takes 46 per cent of the welfare cake. Other benefits are minimal.

I believe the vast majority of welfare recipients are law biding citizens, and I certainly dont lose sleep at night worrying about the few whom you clearly get stressed up about.

Yes our country, and society has changed, but we still need long term secure jobs and decent minimum wages to pay mortgages and extortionate rents in the private sector because Margaret Thatcher stopped building council houses over 30 years ago during her right to buy. Not to mention the above inflation Utilities need paying, they were privatized by Margaret Thatcher.

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 12:40:53

Taking the country back to pre WW2?!!! There is honestly no answer to that except that it is blatantly absurd and not worth discussing. You cannot possibly compare the Nazi's attitudes towards their Jewish/minority population with the present government's attempts to rein in our ever burgeoning welfare bill, and to liken any government in this country in such a way is shameful. The success of any country relies on a healthy economy which the Labour government in the 1970's lamentably failed to deliver. The country simply couldn't go on like that heading as it was for disaster exactly like Greece, with presumably someone else picking up the bill, again and again!
In 2006 this country finally finished paying the Americans reparation for loans connected to WW2. I suppose we could have pleaded poverty and over the difficult years post WW2, refused to pay but battered as we were, to our credit we took neither of these options. Money borrowed has to be repaid, finances have to be kept in check particularly the national debt otherwise it the slippery slope to ruin as has been proved again and again over the centuries worldwide.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 13:27:06

nigglynellie, Yes , this is precisely what the Tory's are doing for ideological reasons. Nothing to do with costs or saving tax payers money, those are just red herrings to get voters on board.

In my life, I never ever would have believed that the deliberate creation of over a million food banks would be attributed to a successful economy ????????

And the State pension takes 46 per cent of our welfare bill.

We need council housing built at low rents so people can save up to buy their own house if they so wish, we need fair taxation, and decent minimum wages....

The Tory's are indeed taking us back to pre- WW2, and they are using cutting the deficit to do it.

Ana Tue 07-Jul-15 13:39:37

There aren't a million food banks in the UK. More like a thousand.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 13:59:02

I value all this social changes that came in after WW2. I value the NHS, the Tory's are privatizing it. I value a decent old age pension, Margaret Thatcher reduced its value in 1980. I value low rented council houses for people who cant afford to buy. Thatcher sold them off and didnt build anymore.

I value income tax because this provides us with community based vital services, such as the NHS.

The Tory's wish to destroy everything brought in after WW2, because they are ideologically opposed to them.

Ana Tue 07-Jul-15 14:07:38

There aren't a million food banks in the UK. More like a thousand.

Get your facts right, at least!

Eloethan Tue 07-Jul-15 14:51:07

There seems to be a rather callous attitude about the predicament of the Greek people. There is nothing amusing about the Greek situation - seeing distraught elderly people having to manage on pensions that have been significantly reduced. Imagine how distraught you would feel if a great chunk of your own pension were to be taken away from you. And that is just one example of the catastrophic effect that austerity policies are having on Greece - and they are expected to agree to even harsher measures being taken.

I think other countries, and particularly the UK, ought to be careful about feeling too smug about their own position. We rely very heavily on the City for our economic wellbeing and position in the world. It has become increasingly obvious that a fair number of people in the financial sector are unusually greedy and unprincipled. To base our economy on such a volatile and, it seems, ungovernable sector is risky.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 15:04:45

Ana , There are over a million. Google The Trussell Trust and find out for yourself.

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 15:14:19

Eloethan, well said. As it happens, the UK's State pension is virtually the lowest in Europe, more money is spent on means testing UK pensioners for subservient State handouts, that it would cost to provide a universal State pension increase.

The UK's 12 million pensioners have no solidarity what so ever, richer pensioners with other income just dont give a damn about their poorer counterparts.

The Greek State pension is worth 80 per cent of average earnings, the UK's State pension is worth just 15 per cent.

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 16:29:24

Parliament100. Presumably you get all your information first hand, as you seem so well informed as to exactly how and what each and every Tory MP thinks and believes in! How on earth do you know how all wealthier pensioners feel about other pensioners on the basic state pension? Not all people who vote Conservative are greedy, grasping and wicked. No society is perfect, not even Communist ones, hence people struggling to escape from them to the point of bringing them down. We have to sort out people who rightly need help from one's who are clearly laughing at the rest of us. Deliberately having umpteen children just in order to get more benefits is not in my book classified as need. Being given a helping hand while trying to get your life on track most certainly is.

soontobe Tue 07-Jul-15 16:37:20

The Greek State pension is worth 80 per cent of average earnings, the UK's State pension is worth just 15 per cent.

If that is true, then if pensioners have had their pension cut by 50% or whatever, they are getting the equivalent of roughly 3 times what the UK pensioner currently gets.

Alea Tue 07-Jul-15 16:45:54

Do we know what constitutes average earnings in Greece? Or indeed the cost of living?

soontobe Tue 07-Jul-15 16:48:29

Ah. Good points. I think.

soontobe Tue 07-Jul-15 16:55:27

www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/compare_cities.jsp?country1=Greece&city1=Athens&country2=United+Kingdom&city2=London

I'll leave you to do the Maths Alea!

Parliament100 Tue 07-Jul-15 17:04:40

"""""Deliberately having umpteen children just in order to get more benefits is not in my book classified as need.""""

nigglynellie, im sorry, but this just about the most pathetic and tiny minded way of seeing things.

And the truly sad thing is you just dont see it.

I feel sorry for every single parent, mother or father, with people like you around ready to judge.

Ana Tue 07-Jul-15 17:07:41

If there were over a million food banks, Parliament, that would be one each for the alleged number of people using them...

Perhaps you'd better google the Russell Trust yourself! hmm

nigglynellie Tue 07-Jul-15 17:19:03

Well, that makes two of us, as I truly feel sorry for you as you come over so bigoted and, dare I say it bitter. Anyone who can compare any government in this country to the actions of Nazi Germany is, quite frankly over reacting. Maybe you are unaware of exactly how tyrannical that regime was. I would think this must be the case as otherwise you would never had made such a dreadful comparison.

durhamjen Tue 07-Jul-15 17:30:36

I agree with everything you say parliament100.

This government said it would cut the benefit cap to £23000 from £26000. That is bad enough.
Osborne now says he only meant in London, and is now going to cut it to £20000 for those living outside London.
For those just living on benefits, that's a cut of the whole of their housing benefit over the year. And that's a cheap rent.
It's quite appalling that any government can do that, particularly one that says it's a government for all the people.

Could you lose over £100 per week and not have problems, because I know I could not. That extra £6000 a year is what keeps me going.

durhamjen Tue 07-Jul-15 17:32:35

Trussell Trust, Ana. A million people using food banks is probably what he meant.

Elegran Tue 07-Jul-15 17:36:34

Or even the Trussell Trust. Over a million people using food banks is bad enough, but inflating that to over a million foodbanks and mis-spelling the source of your ?information? is not giving a lot of back-up to your arguments.

"All told, there may be around 800 food banks across the UK. And there are other providers of emergency food assistance too, for example soup kitchens or ‘Meals on Wheels‘. In total, there are estimated to be about 1,500 emergency food assistance providers in Britain. [In 2014/15] the 450 Trussell Trust food banks, with their 1.1 million uses, account for almost a third of that provision."

https://fullfact.org/factcheck/economy/food_bank_number-40853

durhamjen Tue 07-Jul-15 17:38:17

Makes me pleased I do not live in London, soon. Cost of living just behind New York which is the base of 100 used. The cost of living in Athens is just more than half what it is in London. I'd quite like Greek transport costs. Might make me use public transport more.

GillT57 Tue 07-Jul-15 17:39:19

Although you make some valid points Parliament100 you do rather spoil the effect by getting your facts wrong. There are not a million food banks, there have been a million visits to food banks, still shameful in a civilised and wealthy society but throwing inaccurate sweeping statements around riles people. For what it is worth, I think you are right about the Tories using the excuse of austerity to push through their programme of small government and welfare. I wish that you, and everyone else who does so, would stop referring to the retirement pension as 'welfare' or a 'benefit'. We all contribute to this all our working lives, as do our employers, and as far as I am aware, the treasury/government does not contribute to this fund, and some people do not even live to collect theirs. This is not a benefit, not a hand out it is my money. Now, if you wish to have some credibility on here, get your facts straight.

Elegran Tue 07-Jul-15 17:39:22

Godwin's Law ". . . an internet adage that is derived from one of the earliest bits of Usenet wisdoms, which goes “if you mention Adolf Hitler or Nazis within a discussion thread, you’ve automatically ended whatever discussion you were taking part in.”