Re the miners strike, many commentators believe that the underlying agenda was not predominantly an economic one but a political one - to emasculate the unions by making an example of the NUM. Archive material reveals that, far from Mrs Thatcher's statements that the government could not involve itself in the dispute but must leave it to the NUM and NCB to fight it out between themselves, she was pulling the strings behind the scene.
Mrs Thatcher hated the unions.
As the Guardian reported in 2014:
"Reports of Thatcher’s infamous “enemy within” speech, delivered in private to the Conservative backbench 1922 committee the previous July, provoked widespread outrage, because she had appeared to say Britain’s mining communities were as dangerous an enemy as the Argentinian dictator General Galtieri had been over the Falklands.
Her own handwritten notes for that speech , released for the first time by the Margaret Thatcher Foundation on Friday, confirm her intentions
Now the draft transcripts of the discarded conference speech reveal that, far from regretting using the phrase “enemy within”, which she had only used previously used in private, the Tory prime minister was quite prepared, in the middle of the bitter 1984-85 miners’ strike, to repeat it publicly – and widen it to include nearly the whole of the Labour movement."
History shows that Scargill was right - her aim was to close the mines, and not solely for economic reasons. I never understood why Scargill did not hold a ballot because it would undoubtedly have shown support for a strike and in not doing so it allowed the right wing to claim that the strike was not legitimate.
The right wing always talks of unions "holding the country to ransom" but are noticeably silent when companies which, if asked to pay proper wages to, and provide proper working conditions for, their employees, threaten that they will leave the country and re-locate their businesses in parts of the world where employees have no choice but to be compliant.