Gransnet forums

News & politics

Tory welfare cuts will impoverish 200,000 children next year and more than 600,00 in 2020

(700 Posts)
Gracesgran Thu 08-Oct-15 21:49:08

The Resolution Foundation has found that Tory welfare cuts will impoverish 200,000 children next year and more than 600,00 in 2020.
Their report can be found here and starts:

Measures announced at the Summer Budget are expected to significantly increase the number of children (and households) living in poverty (households with less than 60 per cent of median income). Despite positive action on low pay, cuts to working age benefits mean that most of this increase is expected to be among those living in working households.

Their worry is that this will go unnoticed because "The Welfare Reform and Employment Bill removes the requirement on Government to meet the 2020 child poverty target established in the Child Poverty Act 2010."

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 21:18:01

It wasn't an 'attack' it was an observation. Why do you have to exaggerate?

And I have discussed several aspects of the topic, just like many others on this thread.

durhamjen Tue 20-Oct-15 21:15:34

If Osborne does not change his mind on this at all, there are 71 Tory MPs who could lose their seats at the next election just because of this
Although that would be nice, I'd still rather he changed his mind now instead of punishing all those families over the next four years.
He didn't want the minimum wage, but has now realised it's a good idea.
He did not want the living wage, but now realises it's a good concept, even if he is lying about it.
I wonder how long it will take to wear him down about the tax credits.

durhamjen Tue 20-Oct-15 21:10:39

Ana, why can you never discuss the topic? Why does it matter how or where I get my information? Why do you have to attack me for that?

trisher Tue 20-Oct-15 20:45:58

roseaarered "when there is no alternative" There is an alternative have a more equal society where the richest pay their share and the poorest are supported. Just because you refuse to recognise this doesn't mean it doesn't exist- there's none so blind as those who will not see. Bankers get huge bonuses, the poor get their benefits cut-if there is a difficult patch you can deal with things differently

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 20:10:05

Yes, you do your own research and not rely on the organisations you've signed up to to feed you information!

Anniebach Tue 20-Oct-15 19:36:45

There is an alternative though

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 19:35:23

I thought you were sent most of your links by email, durhamjen, which you then transfer directly onto here...

rosesarered Tue 20-Oct-15 19:13:45

Anna is correct, when there is no alternative, you simply have to manage.None of us stated that it is desirable for people to have less, who would want that,but that if you are going through a difficult patch, or your tax credits are reduced to your detriment, then you have to be as careful as possible with money, make cutbacks.

durhamjen Tue 20-Oct-15 19:08:10

My search facility finds far more than most people's, though, Ana.

Here's another fullfact about the living wage.

fullfact.org/factcheck/economy/six_million_jobs_below_living_wage-48825

The Mirror said 6 million earn below the living wage, but fullfact asked and found out it was ONLY 5.4 million+.

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 19:02:07

I think the point some of us were making (not all) was that it can be done, and was done, with very little complaint or expectation that the taxpayer would automatically bail us out.

trisher Tue 20-Oct-15 18:53:14

To those who think there are families on benefit working the system, I think you may be correct BUT I would far rather fund a few who are taking advantage of the system, and have decent levels of benefits for all, than cut benefit spending, and see families living in more poverty. I don't understand those who keep harping on about how they survived on low incomes. One would think such experiences would make them want better for today's children.

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 18:48:50

Yes, I agree that the process involved in claiming some benefits such as the ones you mention can and does deter some people from claiming what they're entitled to, Iam64.

That aspect should definitely be addressed - could an impartial third party make the claim on their behalf (obviously there'd have to be medical/physical evidence as well in support).

Iam64 Tue 20-Oct-15 18:38:48

Thanks Ana , that's a lot of money isn't it and it's good to see it publicised. I've previously acknowledged that in work I did see a small amount of benefit exploitation (yes, some fraud as well) but most folk I come across in work or private life really struggle if they're long term unemployed. I also know many people who don't claim benefits to which they are definitely entitled, particularly PIP/former Disabled Living Allowance, because they just can't face the processes/humiliation involved.

Ana Tue 20-Oct-15 18:30:23

Your search facility can't be very good, durhamjen

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3279222/How-13BILLION-benefits-not-claimed-year-including-half-people-dole.html

durhamjen Tue 20-Oct-15 18:16:39

Can't find the DM one, Iam, but here's one from Joe Hales.

speye.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/66-million-per-day-24-billion-per-yearin-welfare-goes-unclaimed/

According to Ageuk, it's £5.5 billion a year for the elderly.

durhamjen Tue 20-Oct-15 18:10:58

Look at this. Another trap for the low paid.

speye.wordpress.com/2015/10/20/pay-more-to-stay-230-pw-rent-increase/

whitewave Tue 20-Oct-15 11:27:48

Oh I have just heard that disabled benefits are being eyed up for possible cuts, oh good!

Iam64 Tue 20-Oct-15 07:50:03

The daily mail on line has a piece this morning about the huge amounts saved because people aren't applying for benefits to which they are entitled. Apologies for my inability to do a link, maybe someone else can?

whitewave Tue 20-Oct-15 06:40:19

See Gideon is refusing to back down over tax credits. Lords might defeat them though.

Apparently the general opinion is that Gideon intends for there to be further cuts in autumn statement.
Wonder who is going to lose out next time. More tax credit cuts? Pension benefit cuts? Unemployment benefit?
We haven't long to find out

rosequartz Mon 19-Oct-15 23:35:47

My dad smoked a pipe - the St Bruno tins were very useful for keeping things in but you couldn't write on them.
Pins, buttons, seeds etc

(No, he wasn't Harold Wilson but nearly grin)

Ana Mon 19-Oct-15 23:18:33

grin

rosesarered Mon 19-Oct-15 23:18:15

see, back then everyone was doing it....Djens Dad used to open the fag packet up in order to write more things down.It was a simpler world.

rosesarered Mon 19-Oct-15 23:16:23

I know, it is a bit shocking, aged 13, but if I hadn't spent my pocket money on Capstan Full Strength, where would I have done all my maths jottings?

Ana Mon 19-Oct-15 22:57:21

I wouldn't know, I wasn't smoking when I was 13 roses (and I must say I'm quite shocked that you apparently were!) grin

durhamjen Mon 19-Oct-15 22:56:24

In which case I do not understand why the government hasn't brought in plain white packaging to make it easier for themselves.
Could possibly have something to do with the fact that they are in the pockets of the cigarette companies.
My dad always used to open them up to give himself more space to write.