Still no response to our questions about the DM front page, granjura?
🦞 The Lockdown Gang still chatting 🦞
This was a comment on another thread but that bit of the conversation was detracting from the subject so I thought I would ask about it on a new thread. I hope that is OK.
Is it really wrong to have a poor of opinion of a particular newspaper? I have to admit I was surprised to see this as many have such opinions as far as I can tell. The Sun and The Mail are certainly seen in a particular way. The Guardian is often referred to as the Grundian because of it's spelling mistakes. The Telegraph used to be and may still be referred to as the Torygraph.
The now deceased Daily Sport (which specialised in celebrity news and soft core pornographic stories and images, according to Wikipedia) and the Morning Star could each be used to set the scene in a novel which somewhat implies that we all have opinions about newspapers.
If having an opinion about them is something that is country-wide (or international in some cases) then does expressing a commonly held opinion mean that knocking the newspaper knocks all that read it as was suggested? Surely not.
Still no response to our questions about the DM front page, granjura?
You do know who Russell Howard is, don't you? it was his 'quote' - he is very funny actually, one of my favourite comedians at the moment. In satire you often find an awful lot of truth- although that quote may have been a joke as an example of the kid of tosh that comes out of the Daily Wail, in your VERY OWN press.
Again, don't know whether to cry or laugh- again I will choose to laugh, and bid you good night.
Grumpa have you ever lived in FRance or Germany- do you speak both languages fluently?
Haven't newspapers always been knocked since the early 1800s?
So not a Mail front page, but a quote from a comedian?
I will certainly feel free to knock the Daily Mail- an appalling newspaper.
Yes, what a mish-mash of quotes from left-wing sources that post was - such a pity people have to rely on 'satirical' sources rather than expressing their views in their own words.
Grumppa
But go ahead if you've ever read either
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


How patronising can you get!! My gob is frankly smacked!
For all you know granjura , * grumppa* could be an MEP (retired or not), foreign correspondent for one of the major media organisations, unversity lecturer, journalist, French or German resident, diplomat, author, critic, polyglot or polymath!
Whatever, that "ever" is downright insulting!
I sometimes wonder if some people have any idea of the educational, intellectual, cultural and professional background of the myriad members of Gransnet?
If you are going to pass a "joke" off as genuine, make that clear, satire is one thing, slander another.
It was a feeble joke at best, racist, biased, prejudiced and did not bear repeating especially in the context of a "discussion" of the press.
I have called off my search for the real Daily Mail headline.
I can only think that those who feel hurt when a newspaper is criticised feel hurt because they support the views & opinions of said paper and therefore transfer the comment ' I think the Morning Bugle is rubbish' to be saying ' I think the Morning Bugle readers are rubbish' which is not the same thing at all!
I read various papers online but do get a preferred one delivered daily. If you only read one you do not get a balanced view or have your thinking challenged. Even in my preferred paper there are articles/opinions that I will disagree with but I like the 'tone/ style' of the paper better than the 'tone/style' of some others.
This whole thread convinces me that I would never criticise any newspaper at all 'on the forum', we are all free to make up our own minds , and I have.
What I think in private is another matter.
And if that's not patronising, Alea, I do not know what is.
What do you know about anyone's background other than your own?
I know you do not have any idea about my educational, intellectual, cultural or professional background.
It was a very simple question Alea. If Grumpa has lived in either, or speaks either fluently, or is an MP, or whatever- then I would love to know. It would be very interesting to have a great exchange of views with him.
Really looking forward to hear from him.
Ana:
Well, you can't deny the Guardian is left-wing! grin
of course, can you deny the Daily Mail is right-wing?
Well, we do know that you ran a vegetarian café, had a bed and breakfast business and taught for the final 10 years of your working life, durhamjen, because you've told us on various threads.
Plus, your political views are obvious! Admittedly we don't know the rest - but neither do you about anyone else.
Alea, I never passed that 'joke' as genuine- it was clearly quoted from a well-known (and very funny) comedian.
^I sometimes wonder if some people have any idea of the educational, intellectual, cultural and professional background of the myriad members of
Gransnet^
" I know you do not have any idea of my educational, intellectual, cultural or professional background"
My point exactly, DJ, I imagine you are quite surprised to find we agree on that at least.
As far as I remember, grumppa is highly educated and from what he has said in the past, I have assumed that he is a linguist. But I know he can speak for himself, so I will desist.
Freedom of the press is taken for granted in this country, though this freedom has in recent years been abused, as in the 'bugging' scandal. Freedom of speech gives me the right to express my disagreement with any publication that presents views which I find counter to my own beliefs. In many places on this planet this would land me in jail or worse. If I think a newspaper article is rubbish, I'll say so, but also attempt to justify what I say. If this hurts some delicate feelings, all I can say is, 'grow up'.
Thank you for your support Alea. I thought I was agreeing with granjura; heaven help those who disagree with her.
For the record, I am fluent in French and German, and read at least one edition of both the papers I mentioned every week. For years I worked in European financial and legislative circles, involving negotiations with the European Commission. I have lived in France.
And when I said 'criticise' the two foreign papers I was using the word in its widest sense, embracing positive as well as negative criticism. I was obviously being over-subtle, and for that I kneel humbly in the Edelweiss.
Sorry, you've got that wrong, Ana.
Oh - you mean you lied? 
Alea, it's the way you say 'some people' that grates.
No, I did not lie. I did not spend the last ten years of my working life teaching.
OK, but you did teach for ten years at some point. Sorry I got the timing wrong.
anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/daily-mail-olympic-plastic-brits.html here are some reasons why I do not choose to buy the DM. In my view it promotes disharmony and stirs up sh*t.
Alea, it's the way you say "some people" that grates
Ah, I say that in preference to accusing any individual person or implying that it applies to everybody, so I do literally mean "some" people, and if it applies to anybody reading my post, they may know to whom I am referring (or not).
Would you prefer me to be specific? That would be personal and as you may have found out from a very personal attack on me, now deleted, GN don't like that.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.