pacifists/conscienti ous objectors/Jeremy Corbyn

And before anyone accuses me of being right-wing - ask long-term Labour voters who did not vote for Corbyn how they feel!

That's because he keeps changing his mind and backtracking.

McDonnell is more dangerous though because he does look so presentable.

However, the British electorate are not so easily taken in - nor are the rest of the Parliamentary Labour Party who are obviously so much more aware than the Labour Party at large of the shortcomings of these two.

Excerpt from an article in The Week following the poll results:

'All of which should be encouraging for Corbyn in the run-up to Osborne's Autumn Statement next Wednesday – if it were not for another poll, this one from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner.

This research, using a sample size twice as large as Ipsos Mori's, found that 67 per cent of voters have no idea what Corbyn is saying: they either don't know or cannot recall what he's on about, or they believe his message is "rubbish" and "incoherent" – or that he's just saying "anything anti-Tory".

James Morris of The Spectator says: "Clearly, if voters don't understand your priorities, or think you are obsessed with nuclear disarmament, they are less likely to vote for you than if they believe you're focused on helping working people." '

He is becoming more mainstream now, though, and McDonnell always looks most presentable

Careful what you wish for, rose.
According to the latest poll, Corbyn is the most satisfactory leader among the electorate.

i2.wp.com/voxpoliticalonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/151120corbynsatisfaction.png?resize=529%2C350

thatbags, I agree about special branch but I am not confident in armed police , they have killed several with taser guns

Sorry - not when - if of course.

Don't worry anniebach, John McDonnell would like to do away with them and with MI5
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/12005431/John-McDonnell-signed-letter-calling-for-MI5-and-armed-police-to-be-disbanded.html

We would all feel a lot safer then, wouldn't we, when Corbyn & McDonnell win power.

That particular disastrous incident doesn't, I agree. But how many, what proportion, of their assignments can go into the same disastrous category? If it is an unacceptable proportion then public confidence will be low; if it is the kind of proportion that one would expect from human mistakes in any potentially dangerous endeavour, then there's no reason not to have confidence in the special force and police.

Doesn't give confidence in special branch or police does it

Only the police or special branch can explain about the eyes

To go back to Jean Charles, he was Brazilian, how could anybody describe him as having "Mongolian" eyes?? His pictures don't look in the slightest Oriental, so I am

That man is unbelievable.

Jen , great cartoon doing the rounds, Trump saying - we must get all illegal immigrants out of our country , a North American Indian replying - when are you leave

Trump has an idea to make sure the wrong people are not targeted - to make all Muslims wear ID.
Now where has that happened before?

Think my errors will soon be reduced, my daughter just informed me I can have a Keyboard to use with the iPad , I didn't know this - duh

thatbags, I am now wondering to what activity that definition of iPing refers. The mind boggles at just what could be defined by those parameters!

POGS, I thought you were replying to a different post , so sorry.

I quoted what was said at the IPCC investigation - they later stated they were satisfied they had the right man noting he had Mongolian eyes

Anniebach

You won't get any favours either.

If you honestly feel you have spoken in all truth as you state and feel his death was down to his 'Mongolian eyes' you are not implying racism you are stating his race was the cause. That is your privilege to say so .

Ha! seems iPing. actually a thing!

I am quite calm thatbags

anniebach I have no idea what word you intended to type, what was it?

"yping"

I rest my case.

We all make yping errors and sometimes our 'devices' do it for us. Chill, dudes, chill.

ab, instead of asking people to ignore your typos, perhaps you could ignore amusement at typos (it was amusement, not mockery). Or you could just grow a sense of humour. Calm down.