Exalting Curiosity

If my back could take sitting on hard chairs in meeting halls,then I would go and listen to politicians from all parties, if they were interesting enough. Corbyn and friends excepted, also Farage.

POGS has just posted a quite reasonable explanation, which was demanded of her by another poster. Nowt rude about that.

I was just thinking the same as you thatbags.

Did you used to have a different username, obi? Don't worry, I'm not asking what it was; I'm just surprised you know those two facts about me when your username is relatively new to me so I had assumed you were a relatively new gransnetter. You don't come across as the sort of poster I'd fail to notice

Explains why you never feel insulted. And have nothing against any freedom of speech.

Of course it is rude. Very rude.
Surprised you cant see it. Interesting.

Your post isn't rude, pogs.

dj, you asked; pogs explained.

One can be open to views without ever wanting to vote for the person(s) holding said views. At present I think I can say I won't ever vote for Corbyn either. I'm still interested in what he has to say and, who knows, if his pragmatism improves and he becomes, in my view, a better politician (no, I'm not saying he's a bad one right now, just not good enough for my purposes; I'm more of a moderate than he is), I might change my mind.

There's no need to be so bloody rude!!!!
Pardon me for showing interest in your reasoning.

DJ

He was a new local candidate for the last General Election. So at the time Miliband would have been the PM had Labour got in. I have no idea if he was what you call Socialist Labour/New Labour but he did not go under Labour CO OP. I obviously had to elect an MP who was not only standing for Westminster but my local area and I wanted to hear what he had to say. Now you and others obviously do not understand that concept but a lot of the electorate are interested in hearing more than one bloody minded opinioin.

You bring up Corbyn. I mentioned Corbyn in response to another personal question by Eloethan who , I will be polite in saying, dictated my reason for attending which ironically just proved the point that single minded, prejudiced views are held by some to the extent they feel they and only they know what another persons motives are. Corbyn and Liz Kendall were mentioned by myself to give an example that runs with the theme of the thread, do we / can we assume to know peoples thoughts because of our own bigotry/bias. He was not mentioned to get into yet another argument with you nor anybody else.!!!

If anybody cares to bore themselves witless they will note I mentioned the fact I attended his meeting initially to give an example of what the thread Links were trying to debate and by giving a personal example I was showing the stupidity, naivity, prejudiced opinion of making an assumption that the mere fact somebody attends a meeting DOES NOT mean they are neccessarily a supporter , there are other factors that may give a plausible reason as to why they attended.

If the thread is turned to be about Dreyfuss and myself having attended a political meeting then to be honest it just detracts from the reasoned thought behind the thread/OP as both Dreyfuss and myself are examples of behaviour , the thread is not whether or not we personally support the person we went to hear.

I wondered if it was a new labour or a socialist labour, or labour coop candidate.
It's just that you said we should all be open to all views, then that you wouldn't ever vote for Corbyn.
You would only ever be able to vote for Corbyn if you lived in his constituency.
What you actually mean, I think, is that you would not vote for a real socialist.
Is that right?

DJ

Why do you want to know who I went to see?

Some people don't like a meaning being inferred from their posts which wasn't there, obieone

Would you like to come and sit at my laptop and type my posts for me. dj? It would save me an awful lot of time, and you would then get exactly what you thought I would say. No need to insert your own bias into it then.

And stop trying to hector me into agreeing with YOUR interpretation of MY post.

You lot really dont get on.

Stop being so literal and see the universality of my post, dj No mention of or reference to any specific single-minded pursuit of one system was made or implied.

You still haven't answered my question.

It can also give you a heart attack!

A touch of salt helps bring out the flavour, dj Things can get very stodgy without.

I thought the whole point of this thread was that it was serious, not tongue in cheek.

The implication is that you see POGS as one of those people who see people who agree with Corbyn as alien beings. Is that right?

dj My "alien beings" were from the tongue-in-cheek imaginary point of view of someone who was firmly and irrevocably committed to one side and would see a conference of "the others" as a nest of alien beings (or maybe a nest of vipers)

Such people do exist, and some of them regard members of parties whose views and policies are diametrically opposite to their own as less than human.

Plus people lie. Unless you know a person well, there is not a lot of "evidence" to an opposite conclusion sometimes.

No one can stop someone else jumping to conclusions. No point the man's son or anyone else moaning about it.

Who are you calling alien beings, Elegran?

Who did you go and see, POGS?