Galen in my day the presenting officer (PO) was supposed to be a Friend of the Court and their job was to make sure the tribunal considers all the facts available, not just those that are advantageous to the department. Unless that's changed, they are not only there to put the DWP's case.
I recall many heated discussions between decision makers (adjudication officers in my day) and POs who were often fiercely independent. The quality of the original decision and the skill of the PO were more often than not the deciding factors in the outcome of the appeal. The PO cannot give facts on behalf of the department that are not part of the appeal documentation. As you know, the tribunal can only apply the law to the facts presented.
I am surprised that a PO is not present at most tribunals. This used to be the exception rather than the rule.
My turn to write the pub quiz again!
Rejoice! Chancellor Healey Will Give Us Cheap Marmalade & Gherkins.
why do Wetherspoons employ these idiots?
A general election (democratic eh not like Hamas) is taking place in Israel on Tuesday next week.



but grateful 
It did seem yet another bit of nastiness on the part of the government
