Gransnet forums

News & politics

NHS

(309 Posts)
durhamjen Wed 18-May-16 00:14:03

I am very, very worried about the NHS. If the government goes ahead with this, there will not be one by the end of this parliament.

"Has a hospital closed near you? You're being stomped on!

In 2013 we had 140 full A&E hospitals in England.

When the STPs are complete there will only be between 40 and 70 left.

According to Simon Stevens, to make the NHS affordable and sustainable we, the public, must get used to longer ambulance journeys for emergency care, longer waiting times for treatment and the possibility of paying extra to be seen by a doctor. This was planned in 2013, but shelved until after the 2015 election as being 'politically sensitive'."

From this article.

999callfornhs.org.uk/footprints/4592357931

daphnedill Sun 22-May-16 21:13:12

@thatbags

How rude!

Durhamjen has a right to post what she likes, if it doesn't contravene guidelines. You are free to go and do something else.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 21:12:04

nhap.org/what-you-can-do/facts-fingertips/charging-for-the-nhs/

Two links, one from Cananda and the other about Germany.

Eloethan Sun 22-May-16 21:11:15

I do see your point, thatbags. Despite the fact that David Cameron said the NHS would be "safe" in their hands and that no major re-organisation would follow if the Conservatives were elected and then reneged on both those pledges, we are stuck with these people until the next election. But I think the amount of public pressure exerted regarding other issues has caused this government to abandon many of its proposals. Perhaps if enough people expressed their opposition to the under-funding of the NHS and associated services this might force the government to change tack (though I won't hold my breath).

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 21:07:13

nhap.org/what-you-can-do/facts-fingertips/

Anyone who is interested in the NHA's views, this wiki is updated quite regularly.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 21:01:02

"There have been articles in reputable newspapers about the fact the health trusts are in debt by large amounts and that they have to do something about it. That's hardly under the radar."

Does that mention Tory ideology? Can't see it anywhere. Just mentions finance.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:58:11

"NHS bosses have spent £33 million on management consultants in the past two years – to help them fine-tune plans to close A&E departments and then sell the idea to the public.

They lavished more than £12.5 million on the McKinsey consultancy in the two years to April 2015 – including £10 million last year – and £9.4 million on PA Consulting, according to information obtained from a Freedom of Information request.

The remainder was spent on an array of other business and media consultants, including £301,000 on advertising agency M&C Saatchi, and £537,000 on public relations.

The money was spent on the Shaping A Healthier Future programme, which advocated the closure of four out of nine A&E departments in North- West London.

A Shaping A Healthier Future spokeswoman said: ‘We are undertaking large scale improvements for our two million residents, including increasing access to primary care.’ "
Anyone live in North West London?

thatbags Sun 22-May-16 20:57:18

And we have a Tory government so we can talk till the cows come home about ideals and that it would be nice if... but we can actually do fuck all until the next general election.

thatbags Sun 22-May-16 20:55:08

I thought you never understood what I say, dj. Now you've just proved it. What the heck did you think I was talking about when I said that what is happening to the NHS and some other things right now is because we have a Tory government, if I wasn't talking about Tory ideology? What did I mean when I said it's no surprise to me because this is what Tories do if I wasn't talking about the ideology?

Dear me! It's hard to credit that you could have missed that I've talked about political ideology all along.

What else would you expect of a Tory government? Privatisation of the health service has been creeping up on us since Thatcher!!

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:46:40

Please, Bags, look at the video link from the BMA.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:45:10

Thatbags, I cannot believe that you still think it's a question of finance rather than ideology. You surely are not as gullible as that.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:42:36

It's Simon Steven's five year forward view.
Here's a good explanation of it. (NHA calls it a brief one; it depends on your definition of brief.)

nhap.org/what-you-can-do/facts-fingertips/the-five-year-forward-view/

I'm not going to precis it. It all needs to be read, but I do not need to be told by anyone that you are not going to read it.

daphnedill Sun 22-May-16 20:37:45

What's under the radar are the 'Sustainability and Transformation Plans', which will force CCGs to make further cuts and provide an even less personal service, and the stated intention to outsource even more social care for the elderly to private providers.

This isn't just some scare story. It's happening and is going to get worse. It's all there in black and white for anybody who cares to look. Those 'in the know' already know what's going on.

The media is portraying a service in crisis and blaming everybody and anything other than the real cause, which is lack of funding. People who don't understand what's really going on won't protest too much, if they think anything's better than what we've got. It won't be better and they were warned. Those who can afford private health care won't protest either, because they're alright and object to paying for those feckless and alcoholic unemployed anyway.

thatbags Sun 22-May-16 20:28:37

There have been articles in reputable newspapers about the fact the health trusts are in debt by large amounts and that they have to do something about it. That's hardly under the radar.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:25:24

youtu.be/_mNXpTqn9sU

This is an excellent video, just over two minutes, from the BMA about the differences between NHS and private providers.
Well worth watching.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 20:17:12

Eloethan, on the you-tube video on the petition there are mentions of Michael Moore's Sicko.

Lazigirl, I think that's the whole point of it. Note the 44 footprints have to have their plans in by the end of June, one week after the referendum. It's only people who have links to lots of NHS sites who will notice this. For most people it will only be noticed when they are affected by closures or the running down of the services they need.

Lazigirl Sun 22-May-16 20:09:40

Thank you for the petition dj which Inhave signed and posted to everyone I know. I think it is shocking that this is going under the radar whilst we are preoccupied with the fiasco of the EU debate. We are sleep walking into a privatised American style health service.

daphnedill Sun 22-May-16 20:07:11

It looks like people don't mind being a 'commercial opportunity'.

Do you remember when Hunt said that parents should be able to diagnose a rash from the internet? Errrmm, sorry, no. If my baby or toddler had an unexplained and serious rash, I would want a doctor to look at it. His/her life isn't worth risking.

Eloethan Sun 22-May-16 19:52:14

I wonder if all the services are accessible to everyone equally in all the countries that some people suggest are much better than ours in providing health care. One of the factors that led to the UK being ranked first in the research in 2014 was equality of access to health care.

It is, I realise, an extreme example but In the US those with vast amounts of money are happy with the system because they have access to more sophisticated treatments and procedures than we are likely to have in the UK. But if anyone has seen the Michael Moore documentary "Sicko", it showed examples of how when people became unemployed and lost their employment-related health insurance they could not access anything more than very basic health care. Expensive drug treatment was withheld in the case of chronic conditions and illnesses until they became acute. One woman related how her husband was denied expensive drug treatment for an ongoing condition and became so ill and debilitated that he eventually died, leaving her with young children.

As for charging for GP appointments, this would be a very cumbersome and costly system to administer. Also, some people on low incomes would be reluctant to go to the doctor and might possibly wait until it was too late for diagnosis and treatment to make any difference. And, in my experience, any charges that are introduced at one rate, rarely stay at that rate but instead increase year on year. This has happened with the controlled parking charges that my daughter pays, which have increased from a fairly small yearly payment to a quite substantial amount now.

The chain of private walk-in doctors' surgeries near mainline London and other city stations (not the non-chain, Harley Street-type ones that are much more expensive) are charging upwards of £55 per 15-minute appointment. I had a one-off appointment with a BUPA doctor near King's Cross because my foot was painful when I walked. She asked me to walk across the room, said I had flat feet and needed specialist, custom-made insteps - recommending where I could obtain them. That was four years ago. I paid £40 for what turned out to be a 5 minute consultation. (Incidentally, I didn't get the £350 (!) insteps she recommended and (touch wood) the problem rectified itself in due course. Once we accept that certain areas of health care can, as a matter of course, be charged for, this is, I think, a very dangerous road to go down.

Britain is rich and it is a country which had the vision to recognise that a civilised and successful country must look after all of its people. The idea of some sort of two-tier system that will favour the better off and discourage the less well off from seeking the treatment they need goes against everything that the NHS was created for.

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 19:43:22

If you go on the link to sign the petition, look at the you-tube video Jeremy Hunt drops a clanger. Then you'll see what is planned for the NHS.
Do you really want that?

durhamjen Sun 22-May-16 19:30:12

you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-plans-to-dismantle-our-nhs

A petition to stop it?

GandTea Sun 22-May-16 19:20:16

Well it was way beyond my comprehension. I obviously had mis-spent school years.

daphnedill Sun 22-May-16 19:14:21

GandTea,

I understand the minutes and plans of my area 'footprint' well enough. It has been stated quite categorically that the plan is to have fewer beds, cuts in services, more e-consultations and fewer fully trained staff by 2020. This is all against a background of having to provide two extra days of a full service and further cuts to local authority funding for social care.

GandTea Sun 22-May-16 19:08:18

DJ. I have just tried to read and understand about the plan you mention. My God, I though my brain was about to implode. In one report I hardly understood the meaning of a single word in one sentence.
I think you are making an assumption regarding the cuts you mention, they are one way of achieving the financial target, but hopefully other efficiency based solutions will be found.
I understand your concern, but I don't share your fears for the continuation of the NHS, we will see.
I do find the footprint stuff interesting as I had some very recent inside information from the NHS management which now makes more sense.

daphnedill Sun 22-May-16 19:04:28

dj, I've just looked up the plans for my area. All the above are planned plus fewer face to face consultations and fewer fully trained doctors. GPs won't exist as we know them now. I've been following the blog and Tweets of my former GP, who resigned from the NHS last year. This is exactly what she was predicting. Two of the other GPs have set up their own private GP practice.

Jane10 Sun 22-May-16 18:54:09

Couldn't agree more dj. I really wish that more media attention had been addressed to this than that dratted referendum!