Gransnet forums

News & politics

The cost of Brexit for us; the ordinary people

(1001 Posts)
MaizieD Mon 12-Dec-16 08:29:59

There have been headlines over the weekend, in response to the recent polling, on the lines of "Nobody voted for Brexit in order to become poorer" (though they were good at dsmissing warnings that they would as 'scaremongering') Richard Murphy takes us through 10 reasons why he thinks it is inevitable. If anyone has an authoritative source to counter his points I'd be happy to see it.

http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2016/12/11/ten-reasons-why-brexit-is-bound-to-be-costly-for-ordinary-people/

Ana Tue 03-Jan-17 18:14:31

Only one Gransnetter really, Jalima, any support she had for her view was only half-hearted (CBA to look back now). Just an attempt at point-scoring, as usual.

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 18:16:13

Where did I make a sarcastic comment? Can you give me a reference

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 18:18:04

Yes that is correct as I said "reported" hate crimes rose by 41%

However you are disputing this is that correct?

Mair Tue 03-Jan-17 18:19:02

So it's good enough for The Guardian, the BBC and John Prescott but unacceptable to Gransnetters.

And dont forget Tim Farron and the Telegraph Jalima - you might have missed my earlier link.

Unbelievable how angry a small group of posters are here!
In ladies of a certain age one would expect a little more serenity.
Tea anyone?brew

Mair Tue 03-Jan-17 18:21:27

Yes that is correct as I said "reported" hate crimes rose by 41%

However you are disputing this is that correct?

No I am saying innocent until proven guilty WW.
I have already explained once. Please reread.

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 18:24:18

mair the next thing I would like to challenge is your suggestion when talking of "mass immigration" is your suggestion that "we bring then in"

I think that it was almost certainly a loose but unfortunate way of describing the pull factor, but bring them in we don't, unless you are talking about business recruitment.

MaizieD Tue 03-Jan-17 18:30:51

Jesus bloody wept!

I haven't said don't use the term. Just that it smacks of thuggery and violence and I'm surprised that people think it's acceptable.

If all you wonderful, peace loving, rational dear old grans are perfectly happy with its use please feel free. I'm not stopping you.

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 18:36:12

grin maizie

Jalima Tue 03-Jan-17 18:40:42

Well, your first sentence is truly shocking to me!!

I can remember when was it Richard Dimbleby was overheard using it on the BBC and there was an uproar.

But 'getting a kicking' in an election is an acceptable political term as far as I am aware.
thuggery and violence?
don't be daft.

Jalima Tue 03-Jan-17 18:42:58

Quite honestly, this thread has become surreal.

People dishing out insults right left and centre and then objecting to well-known political terms used by the BBC, the Guardian etc

Oh dear.

Ana Tue 03-Jan-17 18:45:12

Yes, but at least MaizieD thinks we are wonderful, peace loving, rational dear old grans - doesn't that give you a warm glow, Jalima? grin

Jalima Tue 03-Jan-17 18:52:49

Well, many of us are - aren't we Ana ? wink

It's just the norty BBC and Guardian, teaching us bad habits.

Now, if it had been in the Daily Mail I could understand it.

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 19:17:33

mair on page 27 you argue that a Malthusian future is the best way forward. In fact you described yourself as a Malthusian

This is how I understand this population theory - developed before the -industrial revolution,works.

Malthus theory argued that the population grows exponentially whilst food arithmetically. Of course the industrial revolution put paid to this argument, but there are still Neo-Malthusisms that feel his theory holds traction like yourself.

Malthus, when looking at the "problem" he saw as population growth, argued that we should restrict marriage between the poor and between people with "defects"
Malthus described a concept he used "positive checks". This describes processes such as war, starvation, disease etc as a positive phenomenon, as they help to stabilise the population to a more stabilise level.

This is no more than a very brief overview.

It is an extremely pessimistic and inhumane theory, attracting criticism from the whole spectrum of political thought.

POGS Tue 03-Jan-17 19:32:38

blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/03/why-isnt-jeremy-corbyn-kicking-the-government-while-its-down/

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeremy-corbyn-told-kick-ken-7856561

www.independent.co.uk/voices/jeremy-corbyn-vote-of-no-confidence-labour-plp-kicking-him-out-general-election-establishment-lack-a7107246.html

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3701445/Confident-Corbyn-warns-Labour-rebels-kicked-party-offers-hand-friendship-hate-him.html

www.thesun.co.uk/news/2222862/labours-john-mcdonnell-describes-violent-student-riots-as-the-best-of-our-movement-in-damning-footage

He described the students’ actions as “kicking the out of Millbank” referring to the Westminster building.

'Good kicking' 'kick the ass out of' 'kick out' are widely used terms and the world of politics is awash with comments easily found to support this being so.

I am amazed politically astute posters have never heard or read the term before when used in the obvious context used by Mair.

Is to 'give a good kicking' an idiom when used in this context?

durhamjen Tue 03-Jan-17 19:36:07

That's very clever of you, POGS, only showing where Labour use the phrase.
How did you manage that?
I hope you noticed, Jalima, that there's not a single quote from the Guardian or the BBC.

POGS Tue 03-Jan-17 19:38:04

That should read John McDonnell saying 'kicking the s--t' out of Milbank' by the way.

He has a lovely way with words as we all know.

Who can forget his 'lynching' comment, now there is a really cuddly fella.

durhamjen Tue 03-Jan-17 19:38:10

Actually, sorry, that was wrong. It's said about the Labour party, not by the Labour party.

Ana Tue 03-Jan-17 19:42:08

I thought we'd already had a quote from the Guardian - not that it really matters...sigh!

POGS Tue 03-Jan-17 19:43:39

I just put in to google 'give a good kicking' comments and it came up with them durhamjen. Try it yourself.

You are quite prepared to put links up to bloggers which trade in vile comments, insults and as they say themselves irreverent comments so not sure why you would find using a term such as 'give a good kicking' much thought.

rosesarered Tue 03-Jan-17 19:45:23

Maizie ....just admit it, you used the 'kicking' simply as a point scoring deal, you weren't shocked or bothered in any way,it's so obvious.
djen if you had read earlier reports on politically getting a kicking, then you would have seen that Farron also used it, in fact lots of people, including politicians do.
A storm in a teacup started by a poster who objected to the phrase and then heads a post with 'Jesus bloody wept'.....yep, that sounds like a person who is worried by offensive language doesn't it?

whitewave Tue 03-Jan-17 19:45:27

Flogging dead horses???

durhamjen Tue 03-Jan-17 19:48:28

What are you on about?
I've just come on and seen what you put up. I'm not concerned about the term as I have not read what has been going on today.
Mair has written rather a lot of rubbish since I was last on, which I can't be bothered to read in detail, as most of it seems to come straight from UKIP.

Jalima Tue 03-Jan-17 19:49:58

Oh, do you want me to find them?
I think I posted a link to the BBC one and I did read the Guardian one online.

I am not a fibber!!

well, here's the Independent (can you get more independent?)
[[ www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-voters-want-to-give-the-establishment-a-kicking-says-unite-union-boss-len-mccluskey-a7237476.htm]]l

oh, sorry, he is Labour too

rosesarered Tue 03-Jan-17 19:50:13

We just think the whole 'ooh, what awful language, never heard anything like it, so unacceptable' from Maizie is hilarious.

durhamjen Tue 03-Jan-17 19:53:00

POGS, I just tried it and not one of those links came up on the first 5 pages. You must have looked a long way down the list to find them.

This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion