Gransnet forums

News & politics

EU wants us to pay 89 BILLION divorce charges.

(395 Posts)
Day6 Fri 20-Oct-17 13:07:50

Walk away very quickly Theresa May. This is NOT ON. Blackmail or what?

How many of us knew that was the figure the EU demanded? Spite and greed...

From the Guardian. On Thursday morning, political allies of the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, confirmed that the EU wants the UK to agree to pay up to €100bn (£89.4bn) to settle the Brexit divorce bill.

89 BILLION........89 BILLION!!! Before Brussels will even consider a trade deal.

I see the Leaving the EU thread has been pulled because of personal insults.

We have to pull the plug on the EU because this is a divorce lawyers equivalent of pure spite and greed.

We will walk away with no deal and rightly so. Being held over a barrel by EU politicians is not on. We have made an a reasonable offer ...in billions, (£17b billion I believe) just to break away, before any trade deal is discussed. This is not acceptable to the greedy Brussels gravy train.

Now we are being held to ransom by Brussels,

No business man EVER would settle for a bad deal. No wonder talks have stalled.

Walk away very quickly Theresa May. This is blackmail.

WTO talks should begin asap. We will trade with the rest of the world. The EU is cutting off it's nose to spite it's face. Let it do so.

89 BILLION. It is beyond belief...That's what the EU wants just to settle the divorce bill before any trading agreement is reached. I would not want to do business with that firm of shysters.

No deal it is and rightly so. That is all we can consider in the face of EU spite and greed. Let's start afresh.

Day6 Tue 24-Oct-17 17:21:39

Paddyann

The EU ISN'T in control of laws thats WESTMINSTER ,the EU has only control over a very small %


You are very wrong or misguided unfortunately. According to House of Commons Library research, if one counts regulations as well as directives, at least HALF of all UK laws are derived from Brussels, measures that cannot be reversed once passed.

If even one law is made outside parliament, then that is a huge abuse of power. We have no come back.

Day6 Tue 24-Oct-17 17:07:51

* All this talk about who reads which newspaper, job of work, financial status etc, which apparently enhances or denotes their intellectual prowess, is astonishing coming from left wing voters who surely disapprove of this blatant, worse type of upside down snobbery. Looking down disparagingly on other people was once the habit of the rich and powerful, and very unpleasant it was, and in certain cases still is, but now we have intellectual snobbery as well *

You know nigglynellie, this aspect of it all, so prevalent too, shocks me as well.

Liberal lefties tend to be virtue signalling about their 'compassion' and call the Conservatives the 'nasty party' yet indulge in so much sneering and condescension towards others who think differently from them. There were some protesting outside the Conservative party conference in Manchester who were very savage indeed.

It's like a snooty club of liberal elites, an association of haughty, dismissive left-wing Remainers who feel they always know best and know more than others. It's sickening but they tend to dominate social media.

Those who voted to Leave are portrayed by some Remainers as thick and ill-educated when in my experience that is not the case. Most leavers I know are grounded, intelligent, thoughtful and compassionate people who want the very best for the UK and the people living here.

As Luckygirl mentioned, we have to put aside our thoughts about those who voted differently from us. Division and disagreement serves no one well. We are leaving the EU and ought to be pulling together now to ensure our future is as bright as it can be. Predictions of gloom and doom once the deed is done serve no purpose.

What will be, will be and I am one soothsayer (because all we are getting are predictions) who sees a much brighter future for the UK once we leave the clutches of the greedy, unaccountable and power-seeking 'federal' EU.

humptydumpty Tue 24-Oct-17 15:21:22

Firecracker123 using the word sneering against varian is simply the pot calling the kettle black.

Firecracker123 Tue 24-Oct-17 14:44:13

Just trying to find out who you thought the turkeys were the posts that followed are par for the course and just as expected and yes in my opinion most remainer posts sneer or are condescending towards the posters who voted Leave like I did or post supporting Leave that's why hardly any new posters post on the political threads and who can blame them.

MaizieD Tue 24-Oct-17 13:52:39

Odd, isn't it? Left wing wants to leave because the EU is a hotbed of seething capitalism and Right wing wants to leave because it doesn't seethe enough for their liking... hmm

Or perhaps the SW just sees an opportunity to start the Revolution in the Brexit chaos...

nightowl Tue 24-Oct-17 13:31:37

The Socialist Worker argued strongly against remaining in the EU. Just a thought hmm

MaizieD Tue 24-Oct-17 12:36:17

I can't say that I've ever thought that The Guardian was a paper for Trots and Marxists either.

The Socialist Worker, maybe...

durhamjen Tue 24-Oct-17 11:54:34

That's the one I read as well, varian.
It certainly doesn't appear to be the paper for Trots and Marxists.

varian Tue 24-Oct-17 11:09:02

Firecracker I sneer at nobody, but I am sorry so many people were influenced to vote leave by their newspapers. A survey of a 30,000-strong online panel found that only 41 per cent of those who said they do not read a newspaper voted Leave (versus 52 per cent of the general population) and this difference is highly significant. The Express, Sun and Daily Mail had the strongest influence on their readers.
www.pressgazette.co.uk/study-readers-of-the-sun-express-and-daily-mail-strongly-favoured-brexit-in-eu-referendum/

This is not about sneering or stereotyping people, it is merely reporting facts. There will obviously be individuals who hold different views from their regular paper and voted differently, but this is about statistics. If you are a regular newspaper reader you are most likely to vote as advised by the people who control its content. These proprietors (foreign billionaires and tax exiles) have colossal power to influence elections and this was the decisive factor in the leave campaign winning a narrow majority of those who voted.

I know that the Guardian supports remaining in the EU, but it is not the paper I buy. I read the "i" which I recommend to you as it was shown the be the most unbiased of all our national press.

MaizieD Tue 24-Oct-17 10:58:22

Nellie, I don't know if you've ever noticed this but varian isn't a 'left winger'. She's a Lib Dem.

MaizieD Tue 24-Oct-17 10:52:38

Of course you would say that MaizieD because you probably agree with varian.

Well, you are quite wrong, firecracker. I was merely pointing out that your list of people who you think that varian looks down on is making some very sweeping assumptions about them. Which, ironically, is the behaviour you were complaining about.

durhamjen Tue 24-Oct-17 10:28:56

What? Firecracker is a leftwing voter?
I would never have guessed that.

nigglynellie Tue 24-Oct-17 10:16:19

All this talk about who reads which newspaper, job of work, financial status etc, which apparently enhances or denotes their intellectual prowess, is astonishing coming from left wing voters who surely disapprove of this blatant, worse type of upside down snobbery. Looking down disparagingly on other people was once the habit of the rich and powerful, and very unpleasant it was, and in certain cases still is, but now we have intellectual snobbery as well, which is just as bad, if not worse.

Jalima1108 Tue 24-Oct-17 10:07:06

Luckygirl I agree and particularly with your last paragraph.

Jalima1108 Tue 24-Oct-17 10:03:29

In Australia one of the topics of conversation at the moment is the plebiscite being held on gay marriage. I understand that the Government does not have to act on the result of a plebiscite but they would be foolish to ignore a result in favour (I think that consensus of opinion would seem to indicate that).

It would have been interesting if DC had held a plebiscite not a referendum and which way we would be going now, but that is all academic
of course.

Luckygirl Tue 24-Oct-17 09:30:25

I do not think it helps the discussion to make negative assumptions about the people who voted either way.

The truth of the matter is that the referendum was deeply flawed and everyone was faced with a choice about which we had been given insufficient information. It was poorly drawn up with no conditions about turnout or margins.

We are all now in the same boat together and should be pulling together to get the best deal we can out of the EU, whose current attitude sums up for me the many concerns that I have had about the organisation over many years.

petra Tue 24-Oct-17 09:27:41

*Suzied
I don't know about licence on the vermouth
I have to admit to owning 3 German cars, one Ford, built in Spain, but OHs Ford was built in the uk in 1937.
There's not a lot you can do about cars, but if we were to change the German made Motohome we would go for one made in the US.

Firecracker123 Tue 24-Oct-17 09:18:36

Of course you would say that MaizieD because you probably agree with varian. You are just trying to deflect my post.

MaizieD Tue 24-Oct-17 09:11:35

Hmm...

I'm not too sure that your assumption that all the people you've listed are poorly educated and ill informed does you much credit, firecracker.

Firecracker123 Tue 24-Oct-17 08:46:26

varian do you sneer at White van man like Emlyn Thornbury did, do you sneer at the girl behind Tesco's because she's only a checkout girl, do you sneer at the man in the newsagents when buying your Guardian paper because he only works behind a counter, do you sneer at fellow customers buying different papers to you because you think you are superior to them. Do you sneer at the porters in the hospital and the nursing assistant in the old peoples home who might have to wash and feed you and the bus driver who drove you there because they only do manual jobs. Are these the turkeys you are talking about.

suzied Tue 24-Oct-17 08:12:47

petra I wonder who owns the “made in UK company”? Hope they’re using the Italian recipe under licence! I trust you drive a Morgan sports car as that’s the only car owned by a UK company and made in UK. ( I would like one of those but there’s a huge waiting list)

durhamjen Tue 24-Oct-17 07:54:01

"The research, by Professor Matthew Goodwin at the University of Kent and Dr Oliver Heath at the Royal Holloway University for JRF, is one of the first academic analysis looking at the role of the characteristics of people and places in the Leave vote. Drawing on data from the British Election Study (BES), the research drilled down into the backgrounds, attitudes and values of Leave voters, painting a detailed picture of what motivated their decision at the referendum."

Are you going to make childish remarks about them, too?

durhamjen Mon 23-Oct-17 22:03:35

If you bothered reading the reports, POGS, you would see how they get their information, from reputable research companies.
You really are just being silly there.
I thought such comments would be beneath you.

POGS Mon 23-Oct-17 21:44:38

If the Joseph Rowntree Foundation cared to ask me how I voted as a reader of the Daily Mail , along with other papers, I would have told them I voted Remain. Did they ask the 33 million people who voted ?

In my opinion it matters not how well educated a person may be, how much a person may earn, which political party they vote for, what papers they read you can still be a bigot.

petra Mon 23-Oct-17 21:27:45

Suzied
I'm afraid your assumption is wrong. The vermouth and gin we buy are both made in the uk.