anniebach You say "we will not learn anything new about the murder of JFK". nigglynellie You also think there is no point in "dragging this up again". I am astounded that people feel it is right for information of this nature to be withheld from the general population. Surely, if there was nothing to be learned, there would be no need to withhold these documents because all the information would already be in the public domain?
In my opinion, the as yet undisclosed material must be fairly significant, otherwise it would be released in order to dispel the widely held suspicion that the official version of JFK's assassination was a cover up.
In The I today, there is a brief summary of the various questions and theories that have been put forwad, and they are not wild conspiracy theories but point to inconsistencies in witness accounts, photographic and forensic evidence, etc.
The I refers to several inconsistencies and one of the theories referred to is:
"there are reports that Kennedy was shot by a secret service agent in the car behind his limo. When the first shot was fired, the agent's car jerked forward, causing him to accidentally fire his weapon, which struck Kennedy. This was covered up when people were asked to hand in their footage of the incident. No one got their footage back - apart from Abraham Zapruder, who did not capture this in his footage".
It also reports:
"Included among the thousands of documents released in the US on Thursday was a memo detailing correspondence sent from MI5 to the FBI, stating that the British newspaper, the Cambridge News, received an anonymous call 25 minutes before Kennedy was called ..... the caller said only that the reporter should call the American embassy in London for some big news, and then hung up"
"Anna Savva, a reporter who currently works at the Cambridge News said ........ It would have been common knowledge in the office who took the call, but we have nothing in our archive - we have nobody here who knows the name of the person who took the call".
There are many, many unanswered questions, and justification for not releasing all these documents, i.e. "national security" should be questioned. Given the number of years that have passed, all the main "actors" in this event are no doubt dead or very elderly. There will, of course, be speculation that whatever information is being withheld is so damning of the conduct of certain individuals, parties or organisations that it will have an negative impact upon the reputation and legitimacy of their present-day counterparts.
I too have been watching the Vietnam documentary which showed JFK wished to pull out of Vietnam but was dissuaded by the military and the CIA from doing anything about it, on the grounds that it would leave him open to accusations of being unpatriotic or "soft on Communism". There is also footage of a speech he made a few weeks before he was assassinated in which he was highly critical of the way in which the banking and tax systems were operating, perhaps heralding his intention to make changes. I don't suppose that would have gone down well in some quarters.