The President's Club Annual Gala - "Men Behaving Badly"

I will wait for proof not just one newspaper reporters story, a camera but didn't film any lewd behaviour, over 100 girls and not one asked one question.

How often do we read on this forum that newspaper reports cannot taken as proof or truth

Just take a trip into most city centres on a given Saturday night and you will see all the groping, flirting, boobs and bums on full show but there will be no charity donations. Just men and women behaving badly.

I can't see why the whole thing had to be closed down because some horrible sleaze bags took it too far. Surely it should be them taken to task.

I can understand the men for not speaking out, with the hysteria of -"me too" where men are losing their jobs but not been charged, not been found guilty and some feminists like praying mantis waiting to devour their reputations

Oh gb give it up. It's the same old, same old that has been used for centuries. Sometimes translated as- "They knew what they were getting into" "They were asking for it" "They could have stopped/ left/screamed if they had wanted to". Some men behaved badly. Some men got caught. It happened. It isn't acceptable. It's just silly to keep on.

This is the 21st century, but some sections of society appear not to have moved on.

I am not saying that there wasn't flirting/ touching/ bum nipping or whatever trisher . I am saying that it may not have been as rife as some are saying it was. I am also saying that from what I have read some women did the event every year and enjoyed the attention and the handsome payments and tips. No-one was forcing anyone to do it. If they needed money there are always jobs in McDonalds, Burger King or the local chippy. Not glamorous, not well paid, no tips either, but they would not have been told to dress up in sexy clothes or sign a disclaimer either.

Jalima1108 why not publish the names? Should the guest list for such events be some sort of secret?

Jalima said you don't scour the tabloids.
MissA and djen
Just to clarify, I said that perhaps MissA doesn't scour the tabloids.
That was me pondering, not a fact, as I don't know MissA personally and don't know her reading habits.

If there were 360 men at the dinner then is it likely they were all groping the waitresses - or could it be true that some of them saw nothing and were unaware of what went on until later, just perhaps heard some drunken racousness going on elsewhere in what must have been very large room?
So was it right to publish all their names?

Let's put it like this, had the accusations been entirely false, had there been no groping, had the women been treated as respected and beautiful people, there only to make sure drinks were served and the food service was quick and efficient, the men present had, between them, quite enough money and power, to challenge such accusations. As it is they have chosen not to do so. The whole operation has been shut down. But some posters on here persist in making up sad and unlikely scenarios about what went on. Why bother to do so, when even the men have opted out of it? It is of course to do with the still persisting myth that if something happens it must be the woman's fault. Which some people just can't let go.

Not sure where pigs (flying or otherwise) come into it trisher?

And ooh look there's a flying pig!- talk about clutching at straws.

.....and what about claiming you saw something because your friend/colleague said she did. Or suddenly becoming highly offended by something that you previously shrugged off?

Bu gillybob just because I didn't see something doesn't mena it didn't happen. Just that I didn't see it. Which really isn't evidence of anything.

We should be focusing on the behaviour of some of the men, unless these men had been told it was a brothel , where ladies of the night would be happy to entertain them, then they had no right to be touching any of the staff who working that night.

And surely the word of someone who said they didn't see something is as good as the word of someone who said they did.

It doesn't turn me on trisher .

I just thought it might be going to be a recognized sport soon. Finding things to be offended by.

I may have missed something but, I haven't seen anyone here suggesting that all men are lecherous and all women naive.

I can't post links of the job description Trisher but I have never claimed to know them,

Thank you MisAdventure. Strange why, as the reporter had a camera she didn't film the groping or penis on the table, didn't have one girl to speak , it was just here word as it is just the word of David Walliums that he didn't see what she claims .

Could you post links to a job description indicating that groping was an accepted part of the job Annie? of course you can't. I thought we agreed they were women, not girls.
I would appreciate it if you could stick to saying what you think and stop posting things I have never said, much as you may wish I had.

youtu.be/TODYX6fNRYk

So Trisher you know why the girls were there ? Can it not be they knew the men were wealthy and thought a wealthy man was just ehatvthry needed. Unlike you I do not see all men lecherous and and all women naive .

Could you post links to interviews with these girls please?

Whatever turns you on gb

Do we have proof that anyone "exposed themselves" (I don't mean titties either) .

I mean do we have a description? Could it be identified?

If I were bored (which I'm not) I would kill time by scouring the hundred or so charity shops around here looking for Gino books and David Walliams books just to be publicly disgusted and cause a scene.............

Oh wait a minute.... there's probably people doing that already.