I think what he is saying is that the "wealth tax" would equate to the unpaid VAT because wealth is inactive. What I don't understand is whether he is saying we should collect the equivalent of VAT.
Also how would you differentiate between active capital and inactive wealth?
I feel there is something I could strongly agree with in the article but I can't seem to get hold of it
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »