I'm sure there must be people there who have a genuine belief that the child should be given a chance to survive, but there are also people who just like to jump on bandwagons and shout loudly, without having a great deal of insight into what exactly is happening. They remind me of the sort of mobs that turn up outside courts. It is disgusting that, in cases such as these, doctors and nurses - the people who are dealing with very sad and difficult cases day in and day out - have to endure the insults and threats hurled at them by some of these people.
My understanding is that it is the doctors' opinion that the child has a degenerative neurological condition and is already profoundly disabled. In my view, it was right to remove life support because if a child or adult cannot function without being artificially ventilated then they are not really alive. However, at the moment the child is breathing on his own and I think it is right that he be given water and any other support to prevent pain and discomfort - and I'm not sure if efforts should be made to feed him. It is very difficult for people who have no medical background to know what is the kindest and right thing to do. On the other hand, as paddyann says, doctors aren't infallible.
I do have a great deal of sympathy for the parents and agree with paddyann that the boy's father, who is only 21, should not be judged for pulling out all the stops to do what he believes is right but, as Day6 said, I wonder whether he has though about what sort of a life this little boy would have even if he were to survive - and how that would impact upon him and his partner, their future relationship and any children they may have. From what I have read, the little boy would have to be fed intravenously, would be unable to communicate, might not have a swallow reflex, etc, etc. It's not the sort of life I'd want for myself or for anyone close to me.