Threads meander.
I think someone mentioned Lord Lucan because I mentioned Jacob Rees-Mogg's nanny in a post.
Lateral thinking.
Retirement is it what you thought it would be?
Voting. I’m so glad we still have the ‘old fashioned’ system…
With an open attack on Theresa Mays handling of the Brexit negotiations many in the media believe that Jacob Rees-Mogg has made his first open move in a bid to become Conservative party leader and Britain's next Prime Minister.
Rees-Mogg in yet another of his ongoing interviews with the media lambasted "weak" Theresa May for preparing the UK for "Brexit failure". Rees-Mogg stated that with The British negotiators going into each set of negotiations with an attitude of "we will kowtow before you, Mr Barnier in every way you possible throughout these talks" there is no hope of success for the UK. The foregoing are undoubtedly harsh words indeed even from an arch hard line Brexitier, but many believe that there is far more to Rees-Moggs words than just Brexit.
It may well be that this hard line right wing politician has witnessed the way that Jeremy Corbyn has moved the Labour party to the left and now feels he could carry out the same in the Conservative party with the exception of that move being in the opposite direction in regards to political ground.
Evidence to the above can be seen in Rees-Moggs attack on Scottish Conservative Leader Ruth Davison, for in the same interview he stated that Davison should not be allowed to marry her longtime same sex partner as planned. However, same sex marriage legislation was put before parliament and passed in 2013 under the David Cameron coalition government.
In making the above comment Rees-Mogg is undoubtedly looking to damage Ruth Davison, who also is seen as a possible next leader of the Conservative party. That stated, it is also being seen as a move against centre ground Concervatives in parliament.
In the above can be seen shades of Momentum's original moves against centre Blairite MPs in the Labour party.
Threads meander.
I think someone mentioned Lord Lucan because I mentioned Jacob Rees-Mogg's nanny in a post.
Lateral thinking.
I will post links from uYube , such a sense of humour
Well, I am sure that the actions and words of Jacob Rees-Mogg and his freinds and Associates will give us all much more to discuss very fully on this thread in the coming weeks and months. 
I thought the Lucan discussion interesting ?
Is that what is known as “Whatiffery”?
I have been very aware of rapid changes of subject or a total ignoring of questions which “do not suit”
Rather like posters being disgusted by a Labour Party members group who refused to allow Tessa Jowell one minute of respect and a poster change the discussion to victims of an airline crash , talking it out ?
Apologies should be Nearly not pearly above. 
There is a group on this forum who will see any reference to a topic that is not Tory policy or is even vaguely critical of the Conservative Party as extreme left wing or even Marxist/Communist. Strangely pearly all of that group pose on here as Labour supporters or even Labour Party members, when it is obvious to all others that they are true blue old fashioned Tories.
By example to the above I would invite forum member to look back at the early pages of this thread when some of that group attempted to "talk it out" by introducing the likes of Lord Lucan and others into the discussion. Again it was obvious that they did not want the deeds of Jacob Rees-Mogg discussed to the detriment of the Tory party.
Some may view their actions as "political tunnel vision"
My opinion of the labour party isn't printable ...lets just say the RED TORY label they get in Scotland is far nearer to what they are than socialists .
I have been accused of being “far left” on these threads, but I find it difficult to work out why trisher.
As do those who dismiss posters with different views as being Tory ?
As far as some posters are concerned anyone who proposes anything which might be vaguely considered socialist mostlyharmless. It's not a term they usually discuss, just a means of stifling argument.
I haven’t noticed any “far left” posters on Gransnet.
What is the definition of “far left”?
What is the Labour Party now in your opinion Paddyann?
the problem is some label us as far left when we consider ourselves to be nearer centrist .I find it difficult to see any left wing tendencies in the labour party either in Scotland or England...I too vote SNP ..at least until Independence when we MIGHT get a labour party that IS socialist and they might get their supporters back IF they get back to their roots
Did I say you Trisher, I was speaking of a few things the far left have said, you brought up name calling against the far left.
At times I have refused to answer your many questions, you can be aggressive , and I am not a duck
Thank you. I was not deflecting any political opinions but was objecting to apparently patronising remarks.
To clarify - I never have, never will support the Tory party. In the past have voted Labour but the party is irrelevant in Scotland at the moment. Joined and worked for Libdems, hoping that Shirley Williams would be our first female PM!
Believe that JRM is so blatantly wrong for 99.9% of the population that I can't see where his support comes from. In Scotland, is there a single JRM supporter? Not that I 'm aware of.
Happy to support SNP left of centre philosophy.
The prospect that he could ever be accepted here as PM is unthinkable!
Have I called you a "Tory spy" Annie? I have many times asked for your views on many issues and you have consistently refused to answer or deflected the question. So I can only draw conclusions from the comments you make, many of which endorse right wing policies. If it looks like a duck....
Suppose I have got use to it Trisher, I am a Tory spy, supporter of JRM,’ because he amuses me’ right wing, I deal in property, ?
Some far left ,although they claim not to be, are to the fore when it comes to verbal attacks.
Sorry mcem but there is and always has been a group on GN who use insults and name calling as a way of deflecting arguments. They are mostly right wing (although some claim not to be). If it seemed that I was in some way accusing you of being part of that group I apologise.
Saying something which is untrue is name calling Annie something you have consistently done.
trisher may I please refer you to my 11am post on the austerity thread?
No one has called Granddad a communist. I find it strange Trisher that you consider saying anyone is a communist is an insult when you have said your own grandfather was a communist, you seemed proud of him.
What is not necessary is telling posters that those voice recognition things can be used by both sexes , there are very intelligent posters here, I am not one of them, do they need advising they too can use them ‘ the little woman ‘ approach is so patronising . Neither is accusing posters of slandering Corbyn, I think I criticise Corbyn the most, I have never posted anything that is not true .
How you can extrapolate anybody’s political leanings from these comments Trisher defeats me.
2 and 2 do not make 59.
trisher say what you will about my comment that so many of the (few) men who post here show patronising tendencies but do not accuse me of right-wing leanings.
Think you jumped the gun there, based on one isolated post!
A little reading or recalling will show that I have supported your comments many times.
2 issues here - 1. a post that says some men are patronising and 2. politics in the widest (non-party) sense.
Conflate the two and you reach incorrect conclusions!
So now we have a new excuse for condemning anyone whose posts are slightly left wing. Having used Corbynista, communist, marxist, leftie and other insults we now have somone labelled as "mansplaining". What it actually means of course is that those on the right who don't like to read about the realities of the party in power can now happily dismiss yet more evidence. If supplying information is now "mansplaining" then many of the posters on this thread are doing whatever the posting equivalent of sticking their fingers in their ears is.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.