Inquiry Demanded into Islamaphobia in the Conservative Party.

No Grandad but because if you lay down the law and propound from your soap box, it would be so much more effective if the grammar and spelling were less puerile.
Grumppa Mick and Wobblybits have no such problem.

lemongrove, but their is legislation outside this forum that recognise harassment and other online acts as illegal whichever sex it is perpetrated towards

That means nothing Grandad as none of us can know , it’s just a name.
Just as nobody knows how old we actually are, or much about us at all, other than we choose to write.

anniebach, who is grumppa?

Good heavens, Grumppa is male and greatly respected and liked

It states grandad which I have confirmed in many posts

MawBoon ????? To the above

None of us really know who is male and who is female on here, in spite of forum names.

Nitpicking again MawBroon because I am a male on this forum.

Why not Grandad43 it’s not hard to do.

“Is your preference “ or “ are your preferences?”

I also do not wish to bold usernames which is my preferences.

I agree mawbroon, a mistake on my part.

Had a long day in the office.

I rather think Chewbacca (note the bold for usernames, ) might be a “she” but if in doubt I, understand current correct practice is to use “they/them/their”

Mawbroon, you can either accept the report or reject it.

The important fact is that I did reply to the Chewbacca inquiry when he continued to insist in his posts that I had not.

If this is the source of link you meant Grandad I am sceptical of the guaranteed impartiality and professionalism of the organisation you cite.
I might have been more impressed with any of the broadsheets, the BBC or even the Huffington Post , but we all know that Trump gets his news from the dodgy sources such as Fox News and from what I have read of the Medium Corporation I have yet to be convinced.
www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/what-is-medium/278965/

Chewbacca, you several times in this thread have stated that I had not replied to your inquiries regarding gang grooming in Britain.

However I had replied on that matter in a post I made on the 31/05/2018 @12:47 and gave a link to an article which gave subject to gang grooming, trafficking, abuse of young girls within gangs and the links between all.

It is now obvious that you did not read that post, but continued to make assertions that I had not replied.

Therefore Chewbacca, (and with every respect), do you not feel that an apology should be in order to myself, or some other explanation given

Correct muffin

If anyone has not read Alexis Jay’s report into events in Rotherham, I would urge them to do so.

www.rotherham.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham.pdf

This was not merely an issue around perceptions of racism, ‘political correctness’, or the like. There were persistent and catastrophic failings of services to protect vulnerable children.

Not all vulnerable children are angel face, doe eyed orphans. Some of them - including many of the Rotherham victims - are difficult to work with. They are resistant to intervention. They engage in offending behaviour.

None of that makes them any less vulnerable, or any less in need of protection.

Too many people shrugged and turned aside from this problem. It is imperative that the front line workers in child protection, who do heroic work in the face of scant resources and overwhelming need for their assistance, are fully supported at all levels of local and national government, to make sure all vulnerable kids are being heard and seen.

I would have to draw the conclusion that there are forum members that do not read posts thoroughly
Guilty!!

Some are just tltr

Iam64, I do totaly agree that both sexes are the subject of abuse by criminal gangs

Oh dear Grandad - another post in which you accuse others of diverting the discussion away from allegations of islamophobia in the tory party. I don't see any of that. No one is defending islamophobia. or any other form of racism.

Mae Culpa, I didn't read all your link. I'm fully aware of issues of grooming, trafficking, abuse of young girls (and boys) and the links between all. I do wish folks would acknowledge the vulnerable boys in all of this. So many of them.

In regard to the grooming gangs issue, I replied on that matter in a post I made on the 31/05/2018 @12:47 and gave a link to an artical which gave subject to gang grooming, trafficking, abuse of young girls within gangs and the links between all.

However no one has commented on that post or link therefore I would have to draw the conclusion that there are forum members that do not read posts thoroughly or that they are trying to divert the debate away from the topic of Islamaphobia in the Conservative party.

Perhaps they wish to divert the discussion away from that topic because there is totally no defence of the disgusting Islamaphobia in the Tory party by way of the continuing stream of evidence that is being brought forward.

As Iam64 says - The same goes for men of any creed, race or colour.
read her post paddyann.

It is a shocking indictment of society as a whole that this goes on.

paddyann

If that wasn't such a serious subject your post would be funny.

You are assuming that the men who have been brought to trial in the Asian 'grooming gangs' are not British.

Why would you assume that - calling them foreigners sounds quite racist to me.