Misreading and Misleading the country, like many of you I'm totally confused. As regards Brexit we know that leaving the EU is likely to be harmful to the economy. Few of us whichever way we voted in 2016 can honestly say we really understood what we were voting for.
Since then we learnt a lot more now understand it better. Brits living in the EU were denied a vote despite being more affected than most. That cannot have been right.
Of the 44 million who were eligible to vote, only 17 million voted to leave, 15 millions to remain and 11 million did not vote for many reasons. Both Vote Leave the Remain in the EU were economical with the truth. Project fear has been shown to be less untruthful than leave.eu. There is overwhelming evidence of both criminality and foreign interference in the referendum.
The Government has done its utmost to bully, bribe to force its will on parliament. A hard Brexit is too damaging and the soft one being put forward is not what was voted for.
The makeup of the electorate has changed since 2016. About 2 million mainly older voters have passed away and about the same of young voter are now able to vote. In the colder light of a foggy the result of a People's Vote could well be very different. If Brexit is so good why is James dyson moving to Singapore, Nigel Farage applying for a German passport, Honda closing down and Jacob Rees Mogg moving part of his business to Dublin.
We need another referendum to choose between TM's deal and remain in the EU, that result to be binding.
