Just repeating some of article.
I don't see what was not obvious in the truth written by Proffessor NF that all the newspapers in a concerted effort lied smeared Jeremy Corbyn and Labour. Do you dispute this? What is it if not a conspiracy?
And this? This is fact too.
The British elites could not have gotten away with calling Corbyn an anti-semite unless they had the support, the visible support, of all the leading Jewish organisations.
You have to remember that during the summer 2018 all three major British publications, for the first time in British Jewish history, they all took out a common editorial denouncing Corbyn as an anti-semite and saying that we're now standing on the verge of another Holocaust.
They are the enablers of this concerted conspiracy by the whole of British elite society to destroy Jeremy Corbyn
So why can't this be called what it is a conspiracy? It is.
Indeed, an October 2016 report by the Commons home affairs committee found:
'Despite significant press and public attention on the Labour Party, and a number of revelations regarding inappropriate social media content, there exists no reliable, empirical evidence to support the notion that there is a higher prevalence of antisemitic attitudes within the Labour Party than any other political party.'
A September 2017 report by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research found:
'Levels of antisemitism among those on the left-wing of the political spectrum, including the far-left, are indistinguishable from those found in the general population... The most antisemitic group on the political spectrum consists of those who identify as very right-wing: the presence of antisemitic attitudes in this group is 2 to 4 times higher compared to the general population.'
The report noted that 'the prevalence of antisemitism on the far right is considerably higher than on the left and in the political centre'.
Jonathan Cook described in February how a new Labour Party report had 'decisively undercut' the claims of Corbyn's critics: allegations of anti-semitism had been made 'against 0.08 percent of the 540,000-strong Labour membership. Hardly "endemic" or "institutional", is it?
No it isn't.
The point was made on July 2 when a small UK newspaper, Jewish News, chose to highlight a comment made in an interview with Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt published the previous day:
'When I went to Auschwitz I rather complacently said to myself, "thank goodness we don't have to worry about that kind of thing happening in the UK" and now I find myself faced with the leader of the Labour Party who has opened the door to antisemitism in a way that is truly frightening.'
Hunt's words represent a level of moral depravity that almost defies belief. To use the Holocaust for political gain in faking the claim that Corbyn could open the door to a second Holocaust, is to do nothing less than exploit the deaths of the 6 million Jews who died under Nazi tyranny. It is truly astonishing that a Jewish newspaper would be willing to publish such a comment. Writer Michael Rosen, a Professor at Goldsmiths, University of London, commented:
'A possible future prime minister has said something about Auschwitz which the political editor of the Jewish Chronicle has said on twitter is "offensive". None of this is - apparently - news. What is it then?'
Why was this not news? Answers on a postcard.
Hunt's comment generated massive, widespread outrage on social media. And yet, our July 4 ProQuest newspaper database search found a single mention in the entire UK press (in the Daily Mail) – the comment has simply been buried, presumably to avoid damaging the anti-semitism smear campaign targeting Corbyn.
Yes The Daily Fail don't want to damage their smear campaign.
The reference to this by Jules Rutherford was well intentioned by her and will be dealt with within Labour Though from what I can see she was only repeating common sense truth that should be read by everyone. Though you have to be so careful what you say on social media now.
