Replacing the lying, violence-inciting, women-molesting, Parliament-suspending, philandering, racist, rule-of-law denying, Queen-offending Charlatan is not merely desirable for our democracy, it is essential.
I would imagine her advisors are simply establishing the options open to them should Boris and his low life chums ever try and pull a stunt like that again.
Hi mostlyharmless. I believe that inews is a newspaper. Based in London apparently. Not that it really matters. There's an awful lot of stuff on the Internet. We can always find something to suit.
The Queen sought advice in case it became necessary to sack Johnson if he refuses to carry out Parliament’s order to extend Article 50. Which he repeatedly has said he will not do. The detailed legal advice given is in Whitewave’s link - it’s not a newspaper article oopsminty. inews.co.uk/news/uk/queen-sought-advice-sacking-prime-minister-638320
""It is understood that while there have been discussions between Downing Street and the Palace about the constitution and the Queen’s role, it would not be the case that the monarch would take it upon herself to dismiss a prime minister or advise him or her to step down.
However, i understands that any discussions did not relate to an active attempt by the Queen and her most senior advisors to sack Mr Johnson.""
I don't think the Queen will be losing any sleep about this.
The Queen apparently took advice because she was put in a situation that had never happened before in all of her reign, and, as far as I am aware, hadn't happened for a 100 years or so.
The PM was trying to shut down Parliament so as to avoid scrutiny and he was using the Queen to do it.