I think to label everyone involved in this action as "layabouts" is to make assumptions without having the evidence to support such a claim.
In my over 60's art class this morning several of the attendees came late because they had either been delayed by Extinction Rebellion action or because they'd been to support it. These people are mostly retired but many do voluntary work. They are not layabouts and I am sure there are many others like them. Some objected to the disruption but some did not, seeing it as a necessary inconvenience.
I do agree with their objectives but not necessarily with the way they try to raise the profile of the campaign. Whilst they may garner support, they seem also to be alienating quite a lot of people too and my view is that demonstrations and protests should seek to increase public awareness and support, not to enrage them. I thought, in particular, the attempted spraying of red paint on the Treasury entrance was not really in keeping with environmental values. Some would say such such inconvenience is as nothing to the inconvenience that will occur if nothing substantial is done to halt environmental degradation.
Perhaps if governments had done more to demonstrate their commitment to environmental matters and make significant efforts to alleviate increasing environmental dangers to public health and to the natural environment, people would not feel that drastic action is the only way to change things.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »


