aprilrose Sun 20-Oct-19 11:29:26 the word was 'some'. Why do you take that so personally? It really is not good for your cause to take that as an insult
..... ( never start a sentence with because ..... because "Some" is a word that people in groups like this use in order to make their comments without getting into hot water when someone comes back and says " not me". I have seen it often. They really mean in their opinion "all" but its the way things are supposed to be said . Now of course they will come back and say that I am wrong. But I have my opinion and its has been my experience. The words "some", "many" "most" " a significant proportion" , etc. is over used, especially in debates like this.
In the same way as some ( one?) has asked for three reasons my family might benefit from leaving the EU. I have asked for three reasons MY family would benefit from staying. I received no answers either.
I have seen reasons for staying but none have ever applied to my family.
In the past, before the EU, those of us losing out would have had a voice heard by the government ( our government) and a little process called compromise would have taken place.
The goverment would have heard the discontent and moved to make sure enough people were given a crumb or two of cake in some way to ensure that the direction they wished to take would be the one accepted ( if not condoned) by all. There would have been a bit of give and take.
Since the EU there has been no such give and take, mainly because there are too many other factions and the EU rules have denied governments the ability to act with sufficient autonomy. Some -one of those words again- countries ignore those EU rules but Britain does not. if we ignored the rules as others have done, the result of the referendum may well have gone in remains favour. But there was a misjudgment of how many were not benefiting. Polls do not show you that. Back in 2016, the government of the day , which is more or less exactly the same one as today, took a gamble that more people had benefited from being in the EU and so would vote remain than those who had not and would vote leave.
They got it wrong. They got it wrong because they had failed to realise how successive directives and rules implemented in this country had left a majority at a disadvantage. That is why they were angry. I will never forget the media pictures of Camerons face. The anger was palpable. But they got it wrong and have not changed anything to change the minds of leave voters. The problem is that the media, the government and the remain minded want to think otherwise and keep trying to make it look as though leave voters have not understood.
Well, I for one, have understood alright. I know what the EU has cost me and my family - and my husband although he is afraid to admit it, hence he calls me thick or stupid when I point it out to him. He is simply afraid. He wants me to agree because he cannot admit the facts in our own family case. he knows what happened . he just needs reminding every now and then. The media whip him up and he gets frightened. I think that happens in a lot of cases with remain minded. But that is just my opinion.
I might add, dislike of the EU is not just a British thing. There are many other countries having the same issues and problems with large factions wanting a similar opportunity to remove themselves from the EU. That is something remain minded people ignore - along with most ( thats that word again) other things.