Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Queen’s Speech

(41 Posts)
lemongrove Fri 20-Dec-19 08:38:29

Or......hold the front page! Do some posters think she would have been grinning happily if Corbyn had been the new PM?
If so, how hilarious is that ?
The Queen is very old and has never been laugh a minute in public ( possibly never in private either.)

GagaJo Fri 20-Dec-19 08:37:15

Urmstongran
www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/19/johnson-revises-eu-bill-to-limit-parliaments-role-in-brexit-talks?CMP=share_btn_tw

Urmstongran Fri 20-Dec-19 08:35:13

protection of standards and workers rights will be gone.

Really??
As some posters used to say - evidence please!
?

lemongrove Fri 20-Dec-19 08:34:22

The Queen’s default mode is to look grumpy, it always has been.I think it’s her ‘serious’ face for state occasions.What a fuss about nothing!

annep1 Fri 20-Dec-19 08:28:41

I thought she was showing disapproval too - nothing to do with blackening the government!

But I discovered she did the same thing in 2017 so it wasn't a one off.

And I agree Grany . Totally. But that's another depressing topic

lemongrove Fri 20-Dec-19 08:14:19

Do you live anywhere near Durham by any chance Grany?
Just wondering....

lemongrove Fri 20-Dec-19 08:12:54

Oh please! yeahbut......it’s as others say, it was announced that there would be less ceremony, it’s the second Queen’s speech in a short space of time.
Really....how desperate are you to blacken the new government that this is the best you can come up with, it’s laughable.

Grany Fri 20-Dec-19 08:12:37

Guy Fawkes
@blunted_james
There isn’t going to be 40 new hospitals. There won’t be 50,000 more nurses. The minimum wage won’t rise to £10.50 and protection of standards and workers rights will be gone.

But everyone knew this anyway surely?
People just voted to get Brexit done.
Got bad news there too..

Urmstongran Fri 20-Dec-19 08:01:48

No, didn’t want to divert security forces and police away from their usual, much needed posts for the second time in a few weeks. Plus the expense. As kitty says it had already been decided.

Yehbutnobut Fri 20-Dec-19 07:44:43

Due to time of year! Ha ha. Didn’t want to get the horses out in the rain?

kittylester Fri 20-Dec-19 07:15:55

Nice try but it was announced previously that, if the Tories won the election, the State Opening would be held with less ceremony due to the time of year.

So not the Queen showing her disapproval at all. As if she would!

Yehbutnobut Fri 20-Dec-19 06:55:55

She might have been her ‘usual’ (grumpy) self ladymuck but she certainly made her point coming in mufti and no State Coach.

ladymuck Fri 20-Dec-19 06:48:11

She was her usual dignified self. If she went home and changed into slacks and headscarf and headed off for the Christmas break, that's her affair.

GagaJo Fri 20-Dec-19 06:46:15

I listened to it, rather than watched. She was dour. Who can blame her? Christmas delayed. Had to do this repeatedly due to the mess government is in.

She'll be handing over to Charles soon, and although NOT a monarchist, I don't blame her.

Calendargirl Fri 20-Dec-19 06:41:22

She always looks like that at State Opening of Parliament. You don’t see her grinning and waving as she reads her speech.

Yehbutnobut Fri 20-Dec-19 05:20:07

The Queen was staging her own subtle protest at having her time wasted. Hell, didn’t the government know that the last Thursday before Christmas was the day she traditionally headed off for Sandringham?

This time she had given most of her retainers the day off, had dispensed with the state coach in favour of the company Rolls and just pulled on the outfit she’d been going to wear around the Palace. .

Her face never broke from a scowl throughout. She couldn’t have made her feelings any more plain.