newnanny I have posted elsewhere that the government had to help bail out the banks for several reasons, one of them being that thousands of ordinary people would have lost their savings because there would have been a run on the banks. Maybe you should read some of the 19th Century novelists, such as Mrs Gaskell, who describe in detail the consequences of a run on the banks. Admittedly the banks were smaller and those were different times but the principle's the same.
As regards repossessions, in 2008 40,000 and 2009 48,900. BUT in 1991 75,520 and 1992 68,600.
Finally, the 2008 crash was not the fault of the Labour government, despite what the right wing press tell you. I won't explain further because most of us on here are fully aware of the reasons.