Gransnet forums

News & politics

Aother overview of what's happened just this week in government

(69 Posts)
MaizieD Tue 20-Oct-20 14:35:30

WE haven't had one of these for a while and I know some of you enjoy them...

So, over to Russ from Cheshire for 'The Week in Tory'

#TheWeekInTory returns, and I’m very sorry, but it’s a monster. The little scamps have achieved quite a lot in the - yep - FIVE DAYS - since the last one.

Let’s dive straight in with probably the most gobsmacking sentence you’ll read all year…
1. NHS staff were polled on whether, in recognition of their efforts to fight Covid 19, they would prefer to be given a badge or a snack box

2. It was reported 2 out of every 3 hospices will have to make redundancies. In a pandemic.
3. The govt published a poster: “We plan to cut all homeless people in half by 2025”, which is a bit severe even for Priti Patel

4. The govt insisted we all comply with Test and Trace rules, and then excluded restaurants in the Palace of Westminster from Test and Trace rules
5. In Sept Boris Johnson announced a £100bn “Operation Moonshot” to fix Covid “within months”

6. A month later it was leaked Moonshot was cancelled

7. The next day it was revealed the govt still pays over 200 private consultants up to £7000 per day each to work on Moonshot
8. So 2 days after it was cancelled, it was reinstated, but now Boris Johnson said it will “take time”

9. We’re still giving £100bn to private suppliers for a vaguely rapid thingy to do a hazily defined whatchamacallit that will happen too slowly to produce any useful results
10. In May Boris Johnson reassured a grateful nation that “nobody will go hungry as a result of Coronavirus”

11. He then denied food to the UK's 600,000 poorest children

12. So Marcus Rashford ran a campaign to get the kids fed
13. Then Boris Johnson congratulated Rashford on the MBE he got for his campaign to overturn the cruel policies of [checks notes] Boris Johnson

14. And then 3 days later, Boris Johnson refused to feed the kids again
15. And then, (because let's face it, allowing children to starve barely raises an eyebrow any more) the govt won a vote in parliament to prevent child refugees from being reunited with their families, because obviously that's helpful to ... anyone know who that helps? Anyone?
16. But the govt pressed ahead with helping British people to lose weight (by starving them), and it was reported the (obviously) private contract to provide emergency food-parcels is charging £44 for a box that costs just £19 at Aldi. And the govt one contains rotting food.
17. In Sept Boris Johnson said “a free press is vital in holding the government to account”

18. This week, govt scientists reported they are being banned from speaking to the press, due to “the difficult political landscape”, meaning silencing science is a purely political act
19. More media news, and it was revealed that following a long, noisy, mostly Lineker-focussed campaign to cut the wages of BBC staff, the Tories offered to increase the wage of the BBC Director General from £100k to £280k, but only if it could be Boris’s friend Charles Moore
20. In June the govt gave a contract for PPE worth £32m to Pestfix, a sweet warehouse with assets of £18,000. The govt paid 75% upfront, and the delivered materials turned out to be faulty
21. The govt has since awarded 5 additional PPE contracts to Pestfix, worth £313m
22. The govt is now being sued to find out why it’s covertly handing out almost £350m to a crisp warehouse for PPE it has proved it cannot supply, and Pestfix is using the £350m to pay lawyers to stop us finding out why it got £350m in the first place. Still no PPE.
23. And now, the latest update on Mark Francois...

Nope, that's all I've got. Moving on...
24. Boris Johnson announced the new lockdown rules were “simple enough for anybody to understand”

25. He immediately got them wrong, telling the press separated parents could not see their children, convenient for a man who famously only acknowledges 57% of his offspring
26. Anyway, Johnson then said the rules were obviously too complicated, so he would overhaul them. Again

27. He said he’d liaise with local regions, and provide “improved financial support”

28. He then forgot to liaise with local regions, and cut their financial support
29. Boris Johnson said “whatever happens, nobody gets less than 93% of their current income”

30. People get a max 67% of their current income

31. The govt said it would “stop at nothing” to support people in Tier 3 areas
32. The govt stopped at £7.85 per person in Manchester

33. By contrast, Robert Jenrick improperly arranged a £25m gift to his own constituency - £237 per head, 30x as much as Manchester
34. And Boris Johnson paid £100k of public money for “IT advice” from Jennifer Arcuri, who this week admitted they were actually having an affair

35. Anyway, the Mayor of Manchester didn’t ask for such largesse, or even offer to pole-dance for the Prime Minister; he just asked for Manchester to get the same amount of money per person that is being given to Lancashire.
36. Boris Johnson said he “completely understands” why Andy Burnham objects to the settlement

37. And then Boris Johnson stopped understanding, and said Andy Burnham was “playing politics” and therefore he would impose direct rule on the region’s democratically elected Mayor
38. And in further boost to the govt’s support for regions, Daniel Kawczynski, Tory trade envoy to Mongolia and successful brain donor, called for the Welsh Assembly to be scrapped

39. Kawczynski then called for improvements to his local hospital to be scrapped. In a pandemic
40. And then, after many eventful years calling for Britain to leave the EU, and objecting to a (non-existent) plan for an EU Army, Kawczynski, a technically sane man, tweeted that we should “begin the process of creating an alternative EU” that is “predicated on defence”
41. Brexiters insist we can strike great deals around the world, and immediately failed in negotiations with Manchester and Wales

42. Which brings us onto Brexit: and Boris Johnson’s oven-ready deal has skipped the middle-man and gone straight into the toilet
43. This week the PM appeared on TV in the guise of a traumatised Shredded Wheat, and told us all we should get ready for No Deal

44. It was reported Boris Johnson was “startled by the EU insistence” that he sticks to the agreements that he, personally, insisted the EU signed
45. So the PM said we should walk away and have an “Australian-type deal with the EU”

46. It was quickly explained to the PM that Australia doesn’t have a deal with the EU

47. So Boris Johnson, now a master of detail, amended it to Canada-style deal next time he was asked
48. But then it was revealed the Canada/EU deal includes an arbitration mechanism that Boris Johnson has already rejected

49. John Redwood, a Tory MP and Vulcan, insisted all we want from the EU is the same thing Canada gets, such as protection of our fishing industry
50. Canada doesn’t have a fisheries deal with the EU

51. After a dizzying evening chasing reality in circles, it became an Australian-type deal again

52. The business secretary was asked the difference between No Deal and Australian Deal and had to admit: nothing
53. Brexiter Andrew Bridgen said we wouldn’t be limited to trading on WTO rules, we could trade on “WTO plus”, a thing that doesn’t exist

54. The Chairman of the Royal Inst for International Affairs said “it now seems likely that Brexit will lead to the break up of the UK”
55. The head of the CBI and head of the Fed of Small Businesses said the UK is not ready for No Deal

56. Tesco chairman said the UK will have months of food shortages after No Deal

57. British Pharmaceutical Society said there would be shortages of medicines if we have No Deal
58. Even William Shatner – yes, you read that correctly – got involved, explaining that Brexit means smaller overseas businesses importing into the UK have to pay £1000 just to file the forms to register for VAT, and therefore would likely stop trading with us
59. Reassuringly, the govt said it was “determined to continue to seek a deal”

60. And then the govt told the EU not to bother coming to London for more talks

61. And then multiple Tory MPs, each provided with real human brain, tweeted identical suggestions to “sod the EU”
62. Michael Gove, a quasi-sentient almond who last year said “Let no one be in any doubt how difficult and damaging [No deal] would be”, now went on TV and insisted the EU had to “make constructive moves towards a deal”
63. He then said, inside the same 2 minutes at the dispatch box in parliament, that talks had “effectively ended”; and then that the EU had taken the “constructive move” he demanded; and then that as a result, talks could now “intensify”. Wait for it...
64. And then he refused to restart negotiations anyway, cos honestly, what do words even mean any more

65. He claimed in parliament the UK would “do better” without the law enforcement cooperation we get from the EU, which made even Theresa May gasp “utter rubbish”
66. And then Michael Gove said we shouldn’t worry about the 12% unemployment the IFS predicts would be caused by a No Deal Brexit, because we can create lots of new jobs building enough lorry parks to obliterate Kent
67. I’m sure we’ll be fine, because the govt proudly announced a trade deal with Côte d’Ivoire, to which we sell 0.13% as much as we sell to the EU

68. The world-beating Test and Trace service sent hundreds of people to be tested at a testing site in Kent that doesn’t even exist
69. And then the world-beating app that is designed to give accurate information the public can rely on sent a series of incorrect and contradictory risk-level alerts

70. But good news: profits at Serco are expected to jump 18%, which I’m sure is your top priority right now
71. And on the subject of profit, Boris Johnson is rumoured to want to resign in March because his salary is too low. Which means in the middle of a Brexit crisis and a global pandemic, the Tory party will spend months fighting over which Dementor becomes the next leader
72. It’ll be Priti Patel, obviously, because this week she announced she, personally, would tell judges what constitutes “inhuman or degrading treatment” (being an expert) and they should no longer use the globally accepted UN Declaration on Human Rights
73. And now, unexpectedly, an all-bishops finale! The Archbishop of York was denied the traditional peerage on his retirement. I don’t know if you noticed - it's hardly worth mentioning, really - but he’s the first black Archbishop we’ve ever had
74. The excuse given by the govt was that it “needs to limit the size of the house of Lords”, days after ennobling 36 peers including Boris Johnson’s brother, Ian Botham, and Claire Fox, an unrepentant apologist for IRA terrorism who just happened to support Brexit.
75. Five archbishops appealed to the govt not to breach international law, which seems like a reasonable thing to ask. It's the law. Don't break it.

76. Beta-version human and self-styled "Brexit-hardman" Steve Baker said “of course they entitled to these views”
77. And then Steve Baker went on to say if they have the views they’re “entitled to”, they should be thrown out of the house of lords; and the Church of England, which the Queen is head of, should be disestablished. A perfectly sane response to being asked to obey the law.

• • •
twitter.com/RussInCheshire/status/1318525199940308992

 

biba70 Wed 21-Oct-20 18:16:14

Thanks wmk2 - sorry again. It is so worrying.

varin- puzzling in the extreme. I have been thinking about it, and I am not sure- is it total naïvety, or they they just cannot acceptthe truth having voted for it and kept acceptiong the lies - or something else that I just could not put into words?

One thing for sure, there is going to be plenty of ....... carping and bleating when it hits them, and their families.

biba70 Wed 21-Oct-20 18:17:03

sorry about typos. I got 'carping and bleating' right (as copied and pasted ;) )

Iam64 Thu 22-Oct-20 08:49:13

MaizieD thanks for that list. Sincere apologies for losing the will to live and feeling overwhelmed, so only skimmed through it.

I'm so angry about the vote yesterday, against providing a meal for our poorest children during school holidays. Angela Raynor wrote a piece prior to the vote, in which she spoke of her own experience as a child when often, the mid day school meal was the only food she had. Food was scarce at home and she said she knows that children who aren't fed can't learn because, she was that child.

Marcus Rashford's campaign led to food during lock down. What's changed since then, nothing except that money is probably even tighter in families who would qualify for free school meals. I have never understood why this country recognises that many parents are unable to provide a hot meal for their children during term time, yet somehow is expected to do so during school holidays.

Shameless action by those who voted against the provision of a meal for our poorest, most deprived children.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 09:01:15

This government is simply doing what Tories do. It should be no surprise. The surprise really is that people continually hope that they will show compassion.

Iam64 Thu 22-Oct-20 09:09:43

I wonder how many people hope the Tories will show compassion. My fear is that some don't see it in those terms. They simply say its up to parents to feed their children and see the Tories as managing our money better than the LP.
Those people don't share the belief system that if children are suffering its up to all of us to do what we can to support them.

Angela Raynor and Marcus Rashford are great examples of adults whose determination helped them achieve in life. Angela Raynor's mother had m.h. problems and couldn't meet her children's needs consistently. They were neglected and Angela became a child carer. Marcus Rashford's mother worked several jobs to support her family. Marcus was spotted by MUFC and his mum agreed with the club, that Marcus should go to live with one of the MUFC families so that he could get a better diet, something he needed.

westendgirl Thu 22-Oct-20 10:18:39

I was appalled by the result of the vote yesterday evening. It seems dreadful that these people have little or no empathy for the people they represent.Ironic too that MP's can claim £25 per day in food expenses and of course the dining room in Westminster is subsidised.
How can they hold up their heads, I watched the debate growing more and more depressed at the bombastic , look how important I am speeches of some of the Tories.
This was about children not having enough to eat in this pandemic. Please don't tell me how well you managed etc etc. That was then , this is now.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 10:24:51

Usual brilliant speech by Obama which can be totally translated into what is happening in the U.K.

“Democracy cannot work, if the people who are supposed to be our leaders lie every day, and make things up.

We have become numb to it, every single day! Fact checkers can’t keep up with it.

These notions of truthfullness and democracy and responsibility and (anti-corruption), these aren’t party political notions they are British notions and values. It was what we grew up with learning from our parents and grandparents. They are human values.

We have to reclaim them. They must be put back to the centre of our public and political life”

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 10:26:46

There is a clip on twitter from a channel 4 despatch programme due to be televised in early December, showing children whose parents are forced to use food banks.

This country should hang its head in shame.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 10:31:02

Here is one human Tory

Conservative MP Caroline Ansell quits government job after voting for Labour proposal to extend free school meals over holidays

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 11:09:00

It says something when even Farage is left of the Tories and tweeting!!

Nigel Farage

If the government can subsidise Eat Out to Help Out, not being seen to give poor kids lunch in the school holidays looks mean and is wrong.

MaizieD Thu 22-Oct-20 11:16:44

This is my Tweet of the Day WRT free school meals:

@twlldun

Fabulous to watch the Tories pivot from Nobody Let’s Us Talk About The Challenges Facing Poor White Boys to Let The Little Bastards Starve in the course of 72 hours.

Blinko Thu 22-Oct-20 11:28:01

I love that William Shatner is putting his oar in. We do need all the help we can get, after all.

GillT57 Thu 22-Oct-20 11:32:58

Democracy cannot work, if the people who are supposed to be our leaders lie every day, and make things up

just this. We are beyond political belief, we are talking about human decency and how people think it is acceptable that some children are hungry is appalling. I don't mean just the predictable members of the HoC, but the people who put them there, and I have no doubt that a few of the usual suspects will be along in a moment to tell me that people shouldn't have children if they can't feed them. Well, if being angry at this situation, at these bloody people and their cheerleaders makes me a 'do gooder' or +gasp+ a 'leftie', then I hold my hands up.

stormy54 Thu 22-Oct-20 11:43:00

Can we give Guy Fawkes a reprieve, and a box of matches?

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 11:48:41

I am not sure how punishing children by making them go hungry because one disapproves of their parents can be justified under any circumstances.

These hungry children will be smaller than average, have poorer health outcomes and higher mortality rates.

Inflict that if you dare, what does that say about you?

trisher Thu 22-Oct-20 12:00:54

Whitewavemark2 Maybe I'm cynical but I can't help but think the Tories have a vested interest in keeping poor children badly fed. There is a proven link between nutrition and brain development and lets face it the Tories don't want any more clever deprived kids like Angela Rayner, so starve them and they will be less bother.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 13:19:43

Prof Kate Williams

We pay 1.7 million a year so that MPs can have cheap food and drink in HoP. And yet lunch for poor kids in holiday is dismissed as creating ‘dependency’. Some of those parents are NHS carers, cleaners, nurses - we clap you but we’re not going to help your children.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 22-Oct-20 13:40:46

Of course from January we have been warned by Gove that price of food is going to go up by as much as 20%.

Yet they still deny hungry children in spite of knowing this.

varian Thu 22-Oct-20 19:13:35

Is there anything that the leavers can say to makes us less anxious?

growstuff Thu 22-Oct-20 19:22:19

Whitewavemark2

Prof Kate Williams

We pay 1.7 million a year so that MPs can have cheap food and drink in HoP. And yet lunch for poor kids in holiday is dismissed as creating ‘dependency’. Some of those parents are NHS carers, cleaners, nurses - we clap you but we’re not going to help your children.

The staff at my local secondary school have just raised enough within hours to give all the FSM pupils lunch next week. A local caterer has also promised to feed all the primary school children in the area next week. It shouldn't be necessary, but it's raised my spirits a bit that there are some good people around.

varian Fri 23-Oct-20 10:40:42

This pandemic has shone a spotlight on the travesty of child food poverty. Finally, it feels like this is something everyone is talking about - everyone, it seems, except this Tory government.

Last week, Liberal Democrat Education Minister for Wales, Kirsty Williams, guaranteed free school meal provision during school holidays until at least Easter 2021.

The Liberal Democrats have been calling on the government to make free school meals available for every child in poverty in England, including during school holidays and lockdowns. It is the right thing to do. But yesterday, Conservative MPs voted down an extension of free school meal provision for school holidays.

They're not giving up. The LibDems stand with major supermarkets, charities, Marcus Rashford and the British public, to speak with one voice and say, no child should have to go hungry, on any day of the year.

MaizieD Fri 23-Oct-20 10:57:46

Thank god that some members of the public aren't as mean as our government.

Offers of free food from cafes and restaurants for FSM children over half term have been pouring in to Marcus Rashford's twitter time line.

twitter.com/MarcusRashford

Also trending on twitter is practically universal condemnation of Nicky Morgan, who told Question Time viewers yesterday that the tories voted the motion down because Angela Rayner had suggested that a tory MP was 'scum' during the debate!

twitter.com/search?q=nicky%20morgan&src=typeahead_click

Whitewavemark2 Fri 23-Oct-20 11:01:42

I thought this very true

James O'Brien

There are two types of people in the world:

1) People who look at Marcus Rashford's timeline & feel a combination of warmth, concern & gratitude.
2) People who look at Marcus Rashford's timeline & feel compelled to sneer about 'virtue signalling'.

We're governed by the latter.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 23-Oct-20 11:09:09

It fills me with hope when I read how so many restaurants, individuals, clubs and religious establishments are trying to fill the gap that this government has turned its back on hungry children.

I’m sure everyone of us can find a way of helping towards this push to feeding our children. Every third child you see will be living in poverty.

12bn was given to the Tory cronies who has zero experience to produce a failed test and trace system.

trisher Fri 23-Oct-20 11:31:17

It seems that Margaret Thatcher was wrong and there is such a thing as society- it's the people who care and who act to look after those worse off than themselves. The Tory government meantime is lining the pockets of their mates. I'm with Nye Bevan on this.