AIBU to say that husband was irresponsible?
Good Morning Saturday 22nd August 2026
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Just that really. Watching the News tonight and it seems there are conflicting views, as always.
Cornwall has had a lot of funding from the EU because twenty years ago it was recognised as one of the poorest regions in Europe www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-news/exactly-what-eu-funded-cornwall-2697596
Not surprised at all. It was ever thus, but has grown over the years.
Depressing, isn't it.
A friend of mine who lives in Yorkshire always talked about the rural poor. She said they were as plentiful as the urban poor but largely ignored and forgotten about.
Callistemon
^the EU made sure it went to deprived areas whereas central government would probably have spent it south of Watford.^
You'd be surprised.
Not everyone in Cornwall is deprived.
Not surprised at all. It was ever thus, but has grown over the years.
Areas of deprivation were identified by the EU and they invited application for funding for various projects, amongst other things.
They also invited application for funding for projects for environmental projects.
Do you really think the EU micro-managed the distribution of the funds to those most in need of it?
Of course they didn't.
the EU made sure it went to deprived areas whereas central government would probably have spent it south of Watford.
You'd be surprised.
Not everyone in Cornwall is deprived.
Well, even though any EU money distributed to those areas probably came from the U.K. in the first place the point is that the EU made sure it went to deprived areas whereas central government would probably have spent it south of Watford.
It was in part, Maybee, a very small part.
The Millennium Commission weighed in with £37.5 million of Lottery funding to single Eden out as the ‘landmark’ project of the far South West, and their subsequent contributions brought the total to just over £56 million. We hope we’ve delivered for them and for anyone who's ever bought a Lottery ticket.
Other major sources of funding included the EU and Southwest Regional Development Agency (some £50 million between them, including £26 million towards capital funding from the EU) and £20 million of commercial loans. The balance was made up of £8 million of other loans and some funds generated by Eden itself and reinvested back into the Project.
Many other supporters have played a part in our development since Eden Project opened in 2001. During the financial year 2015-2016 the following funders provided financial support to a variety of our charitable projects.
ASDC / AsusTek (UK) / Big Lottery Fund (Big Local) / Big Lottery Fund (The Big Lunch) / Blue Pegg / Buro Happold / Department of Communities and Local Government / Eddie George Memorial Fund / Exeter University / Eranda Foundation / Halifax / Pukka / Renault / Seasalt / Sky Rainforest Rescue / St Austell Brewery / Wellcome Trust / Woodford Investment Management (Neil Woodford and Craig Newman)
But, as has been pointed out by others, where did the EU money come from?
In fact, I doubt it was to compensate for the loss of the fishing industry.
I thought the Eden Project in Cornwall was partly EU funded and was a way of compensating the area for the fishing industry being reduced.
The fishing industry is disgusting and has led to so much pollution and depletion of marine life it should be much more controlled and regulated. Why we are prepared to foregoing 99.9% of our economy for this horrible trade I have no idea.
I did find that most of the fishermen lost jobs as a result of the Icelandic Cod wars in the 1970s, eventually compensation of £20000 each was paid after a long campaign
The fishermen were compensated. I had a friend who had a boat yard in Mistly where a lot of the boats went to be cut up for scrap.
I’m not sure about fishermen 40 yrs ago, there were certainly lots of regeneration in the former fishing ports.
There have been several compensation schemes for farmers retiring from the industry over the years. They have been within the CAP payments, aimed at better efficiency and environmental benefits.
MayBee70
So, has the U.K. government ever compensated U.K. fishermen for the loss of their livelihood?
I don’t know but I expect david does.
Any perishables in the mile long queues of wagons at the ports ?
So, has the U.K. government ever compensated U.K. fishermen for the loss of their livelihood?
David0205
MayBee70
So, if it’s all about fishing rights what happens to the EU fisheries that bought the fishing rights off English and Welsh fisherman? Will they not be allowed to use those rights and is that legal? Are we prepared to lose Toyota and Nissan over all this?
A quota is not permanent it can go up or down in value according to demand or be abolished, there are plenty of examples of that happening. In practice the national governments would compensate those that lost out in one way or another.
For example if France looses fishing quota their government would have a compensation scheme
And that I think is what we will see happen as a result of the negotiations this weekend. There will be some form of compensation scheme agreed for both sides.
It is what it is. It’ll be what it’ll be. One will cross that bridge when it happens.
MayBee70
So, if it’s all about fishing rights what happens to the EU fisheries that bought the fishing rights off English and Welsh fisherman? Will they not be allowed to use those rights and is that legal? Are we prepared to lose Toyota and Nissan over all this?
A quota is not permanent it can go up or down in value according to demand or be abolished, there are plenty of examples of that happening. In practice the national governments would compensate those that lost out in one way or another.
For example if France looses fishing quota their government would have a compensation scheme
But British fishermen sold most of their quotas to these supertrawlers and nothing will change post brexit.
One logical reason that Johnson had dragged it out to the last minute is because it gives parliament no time to debate.
I think a link to this information would be useful, Jaberwok
Not that I would trust this government to do much for the environment.
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-safety-standards-workers-rights-jacob-rees-mogg-a7459336.html
It's not just fishing though, it's environmental concerns particularly regarding those huge factory trawlers. The Balkans, the Mediterranean, and most of the EU coast has been fished dry, the seabed ruined, marine life decimated, same with seabird colonies. Although I appreciate that for most people on here, this is probably totally unimportant when balanced against mega money, but for me this is very important and this systematic wrecking without a care has to stop and that includes our own fishing fleet, who will be carefully controlled and monitored and face consequences for any flagrant abuse. We're all horrified at the destruction of the Amazon in the pursuit of jobs and money, surely the oceans are just as important? If we have to leave without a deal in order to banish the factory trawlers then so be it.
Alex Andreou
Johnson: “Golly, Gosh, Yah, a deal is now looking very, very difficult.”
JP Morgan ups their probability of a deal being struck from 60% to 70%.
Ooh a little Christmas miracle will happen when Johnson waves his wand.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.