Gransnet forums

News & politics

The working classes just aren't very bright so have no chance of bettering themselves

(267 Posts)
growstuff Fri 07-May-21 00:43:52

Just read Peter Saunders comments following the article and they're much more interesting and informative than the article itself.

growstuff Fri 07-May-21 00:23:47

GrannyRose15

growstuff

GrannyRose15

In today’s Britain, talent and hard work easily trump social class background. We should be telling our children this........... Maybe then, even more of them will go on to fulfil their potential in the future.

I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.

I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion GrannyRose. I'd be interested in why you think that.

I'm quoting the actual conclusion of the article. He doesn't say there is no hope for working classs children. He says we should be letting them know that if they work hard they can overcome their background.

No, he's not. He's claiming that they're inherently thick.

GrannyRose15 Fri 07-May-21 00:23:44

MaizieD

^I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.^

But I'm not claiming anything, GrannyRose. I've just posted what the Conservative Home article says. I thought people might be interested and discuss it.

It's a worry if that is how tories are thinking. A worry for the working class people who vote for them, anyway. Articles like this have some influence.

I have read the article and I don't agree with the title of this post.

growstuff Fri 07-May-21 00:22:28

OMG! I've just read the article. It's superficial and flawed. Quite honestly, it's the kind of thing a professional writer (which is what Saunders is) would write for a fee. There is a lack of understanding and failure to explore various issues. People have been writing books about these issues for years and he's only just scratched the surface. The article will be read by people who want to believe it and have their views confirmed - which is what the majority of the population do. In the short time Saunders was a professor at Sussex, I hope he wouldn't have approved any of his students writing something like that.

GrannyRose15 Fri 07-May-21 00:21:19

growstuff

GrannyRose15

In today’s Britain, talent and hard work easily trump social class background. We should be telling our children this........... Maybe then, even more of them will go on to fulfil their potential in the future.

I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.

I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion GrannyRose. I'd be interested in why you think that.

I'm quoting the actual conclusion of the article. He doesn't say there is no hope for working classs children. He says we should be letting them know that if they work hard they can overcome their background.

MaizieD Fri 07-May-21 00:07:27

Actually, GrannyRose, I've misinterpreted you and didn't quite take in the conclusion he comes to.

It's actually nonsense and completely contradicts the rest of his article. He can't claim that working class children are not as bright as middle and upper class children and are not capable of achieving, and then turn round and say that talent and hard work will help people to better themselves.

My only explanation is that he's referring to UC and MC children only in his conclusion. Because he's spent several hundred words telling us that WC children just aren't bright enough to achieve anything..

GagaJo Thu 06-May-21 23:59:41

To Johnson and his ilk, the workers of the country are little more than factory fodder. That some of us aren't actually in factories is irrelevant. We are 'the workers'. We are here to make their profit. Not to be their equals. Very comforting to be able to explain it away as genetics. Excuses everything.

MaizieD Thu 06-May-21 23:56:10

I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.

But I'm not claiming anything, GrannyRose. I've just posted what the Conservative Home article says. I thought people might be interested and discuss it.

It's a worry if that is how tories are thinking. A worry for the working class people who vote for them, anyway. Articles like this have some influence.

GagaJo Thu 06-May-21 23:49:58

Well, that is obviously crap, isn't it? Tory, eugenic, wishful thinking. Wanting the UC to be superior gentically, to excuse their corrupt accumulation of wealth.

growstuff Thu 06-May-21 23:48:10

Education can give the children of the poor opportunities, but it depends whether they are then able to capitalise on the opportunities. In any case, that's not what Saunders is suggesting. He's claiming that people are poor because they're not very intelligent and can only do menial jobs.

PS. Saunders is a sociologist who doesn't appear to understand genetics, hasn't been a professor for decades and makes his money as a libertarian writer.

GagaJo Thu 06-May-21 23:42:34

Education gets the children of the poor out of poverty. But our culture tells working class children school is boring. And then underfunded schools compound that issue.

Almost as if the ruling classes want to keep the workers down.

growstuff Thu 06-May-21 23:39:07

There is a resurgence in the kind of thinking Peter Saunders is writing about. While there is undoubtedly a genetic element in intelligence, the conclusions being drawn here are flawed. Heritablity is much more complicated and interacts with other factors.

growstuff Thu 06-May-21 23:30:04

GrannyRose15

^In today’s Britain, talent and hard work easily trump social class background. We should be telling our children this........... Maybe then, even more of them will go on to fulfil their potential in the future.^

I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.

I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion GrannyRose. I'd be interested in why you think that.

GrannyRose15 Thu 06-May-21 23:26:08

In today’s Britain, talent and hard work easily trump social class background. We should be telling our children this........... Maybe then, even more of them will go on to fulfil their potential in the future.

I'd say the conclusion is exactly the opposite of what you claim it is. Working class children have a good chance of bettering themselves through hard work.

keepingquiet Thu 06-May-21 22:56:42

Private education much extolled by the Tories has very little to do with education and everything to do with networking.

MaizieD Thu 06-May-21 22:33:44

P.S. IQ testing is widely acknowledged to be a deeply flawed measure of 'intelligence'.

I'm sure that others will elaborate.

MaizieD Thu 06-May-21 22:31:36

No, I didn't say that. It's the conclusion of a sociologist writing for 'Conservative Home' today.

According to Emeritus Professor Saunders:

There is huge political resistance to accepting this, yet we know that cognitive ability, measured by IQ testing, is at least 50 per cent heritable. Recent research also shows that propensity to work hard (measured, for example, by conscientiousness scores on psychometric tests) is quite highly heritable too.

Fifth, unequal educational achievement by children from different social class backgrounds is largely (though not entirely) explained by differences in average ability levels between them. Analyse all the factors that might affect children’s educational performance, and you’ll find that IQ test scores are far stronger predictors than all the social and environmental factors (parental class, parent’s education, parents’ income, parental encouragement, parental interest, enrolment in a private school, etc.) put together. On average, cognitive ability is higher among middle class children than working class children, and that is the main reason they tend to do better in school.

What have people been accusing Labour of? Talking down to the working classes?

But here are the tories being told that the working classes are thick and lazy and there's no point in trying to educate them to a higher standard or push to improve social mobility.

Contemptuous or what?

www.conservativehome.com/platform/2021/05/peter-saunders-the-myth-of-social-immobility-politicians-who-champion-meritocracy-are-pursuing-something-weve-basically-already-got.html