Gransnet forums

News & politics

The Irish Question revisited

(254 Posts)
Grannycool52 Wed 09-Jun-21 23:17:28

Varian, I agree.

varian Wed 09-Jun-21 23:10:12

"This line is that a requirement to comply with legal obligations is to be dismissed as ‘legal purism’.

This line is being promoted at the moment by Brexit minister Lord Frost in respect of the obligations of the United Kingdom under the Northern Irish Protocol (obligations that, of course, Frost himself negotiated and endorsed).

Frost avers that for the European Union to require the United Kingdom to comply with this obligations is to take a ‘purist’ approach."

davidallengreen.com

The EU has always expected third countries to comply with legal agreements. It is time that Frost realised that we are now a third country and if we do not behave honourable it will become more and more difficult to strike deals anywhere in the world as the UK is no longer regarded as trustworthy.

Kali2 Wed 09-Jun-21 20:01:13

It is very clear both Frost and Johnson were fully aware. So were Forster and Paisley too. And Poots (sp?)

varian Wed 09-Jun-21 19:39:28

Brexit minister accuses EU of 'legal purism' over NI Protocol

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-57378954

Presumable "legal purism" means keeping to your word and not reneging on a legal agreement you recently negotiated and signed.

The fact is that it was always going to be impossible to abide by the Good Friday Agreement and not have a border on the island of Ireland, whilst the Republic of Ireland remained in the EU but the UK left the EU and the Single Market, without having a border somewhere and if that border is not on the island of Ireland it has to be in the Irish Sea.

Many of us foresaw problems in NI because of Brexit years ago. Why could the Vote Leave Tory Government and the DUP not see what was blindingly obvious to us?

www.gransnet.com/forums/news_and_politics/1242729-The-Irish-question?pg=22