Urmstongran
^They ARE NOT MIGRANTS^
Well the article Mamie posted a link to actually called them. “illegal migrants” (which I did not, note). I’ve started calling them ‘aspirational migrants’. The article pointed out that many of those coming herehave had their asylum status rejected by the EU.
In that case what is your preferred term WWmk2?
We must be very, very careful with the language we use as nothing is more powerful than language and it’s misuse. Farage is a past master at that as you well know.
Do not think that Johnson made a mistake in using the term “illegal migrants” it was quite deliberate and used to control the narrative for his own agenda, because he knows that people accept his use of language without criticism.
They are asylum seekers, an entirely different concept in law.
They are seeking asylum from the atrocities we are hearing about on a daily basis being committed in Afghanistan, Somalia and so on.
once they are granted asylum their status becomes
Refugees - a refugee is a person escaping war, persecution or natural disaster.
That pretty much sums them up I would have thought.
Here are the laws that give people protection should they be so unlucky enough to become a refugee..
The rights of migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers are protected by international law, regardless of how and why they arrive in a country. They have the same rights as everyone else, plus special or specific protections including:
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 14), which states that everyone has the right to seek and enjoy asylum from persecution in other countries
The 1951 UN Refugee Convention (and its 1967 Protocol), which protects refugees from being returned to countries where they risk being persecuted
The 1990 Migrant Workers Convention, which protects migrants and their families
Regional Refugee law instruments (including 1969 OAU Convention, 1984 Cartagena Declaration, Common European Asylum System and Dublin Regulation)