I have no idea whether the whole world is watching or not, but I can assure you that Johnson's doings are regularly reported in the Danish Press - factually and usually in a way that leaves the listener or reader to make up their own minds about whether his behaviour is suitable for a prime minister, or not.
Likewise, the drowning of 27 refugees in the channel was reported, as was the fact that the French were willing to offer these refugees homes and work in France, but that the refugees are apparently still convinced that the UK is a land of plenty and of freedom and much, much better than anywhere else and are therefore determined to get to Britain.
Whether you like it or not, Britain is now a "third country" seen from the EU's point of view, so if you try to turn the refugees who survive the crossing of the channel back to us, we are fully justified in refusing to take them in. They could and should have applied for asylum in the first EU country they entered, whether it was Spain, Greece, Italy, Hungary or anywhere else.
Whether the EU will refuse to take in any refugees the UK refuses entry to, I do not know, not having had the opportunity to find out what the recent conference amongst the EU countries who have a sea coast facing the UK has concluded.
Rats like my apple trees. Advice?
I am not a messy person but...
Voting. I’m so glad we still have the ‘old fashioned’ system…


