UK's February 2020 negotiation guidelines omitted foreign, security and defence policy cooperation, stating that such
areas did 'not require an institutionalised relationship'.
Arguably, this contributed to a difficult start in the relationship.
Theresa May's Conservative government (2016-2019) viewed the notion of a security and defence partnership more favourably than Boris Johnson's (in office since July 2019, also Conservative), and in 2018 had proposed 'an ambitious partnership covering thebreadth of security interests including
foreign policy, defence, development'. For the moment, discussions on such aspects of the future relationship appear to be 'absent in Westminster and Whitehall'. The initial assumption, according to the Centre for European Reform, 'was tha tit would be easier to reach agreement on foreign and
defence policy co-operation than on other issues'.
Similarly, Jim Cloos, former Deputy Director General in the General Secretariat of the Council of the EU, argued that foreign policy and security seemed to be candidates for an immediate agreement because of the close relationship and the
UK's importantrole. British opposition to formalising cooperation could be explained by the perception that the EU
institutional frameworks for external security cooperation offer 'few incentives for the UK', compared to other, more flexible formats (ad hoc coalitions). The EU's proposals for possible foreign and security policy cooperation with the UK include several areas such as coordination in multilateral organisations, sanctions, crisis management, capability development, intelligence, and development. To this end, the Deputy Secretary General of the European External Action Service (EEAS), Charles Fries, argued before the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and
Defence (SEDE) in May 2021 that, 'there is huge potential todevelop a relationship with the UK once
London is ready to engage in a discussionon security and defence with us.'' (Official EU document on Brexit implications to European security).
This has not happened yet- and so the relationship with the EU on security matters remains vague and 'up in the air'. Which means that engaging in probably the most dangerous war ever, with a psychopath with his finger ont he nuclear button- is not advisable. Putin knows this, tragically.
Little Chicken and sucking eggs just won't help here.