Germanshepherdsmum
*Daisy*, people can invest in shares and pay 5% income tax on the dividends they receive. This encourages investment in companies with a share capital does it not? If the money were invested in another income producing way they would pay full tax on the income. So investment in shares is beneficial to the company and the investor. I would have thought that was pretty obvious.
you're ignoring the point I made earlier, GSM. The only time the money from share purchases goes to the company whose shares they are is when the company issues shares to raise money, either at start up or if they make a new share issue. The rest of the share transactions are between the owner of the shares and the purchaser. I own shares in a company, I sell some to you. I get the money you pay for them; it goes into my bank account; nowhere near the company's accounts.
People buy shares as a speculation, in anticipation of getting an income from dividend payments. Dividend is paid from the company's net profits after taxation. The rationale for the lower rate of tax on dividend income is that the money has already been taxed. Which I find absurd because one could argue that wages and salaries are already taxed, so why should one have to pay other taxes, such as VAT, out of their income. However, taxing unearned dividend income at a higher rate will have no affect at all on the company that has paid out the dividend. They've already paid their taxes (we hope...)
The counter argument, of course, is, why do people who work have to pay more tax on their income than those who have just purchased some shares and done nothing to contribute to the company's profits?
I do realise that some people have invested directly in a company and so contributed to its success. I'm sure that an accommodation could be made for them.