Gransnet forums

News & politics

Nationalism the fashionable form of government

(230 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Mon 09-May-22 08:02:09

We have a nationalist government newly elected in NI

We have had nationalism in Scotland for years.

We have a nationalist PM in Westminster following a populist agenda.

Wales seems to be the only outrider.

Nationalism was always thought to be a concept if government that should be avoided.

What happened?

paddyann54 Wed 11-May-22 17:54:44

I always thought DEMOCRACY meant you were allowed to vote on the same issues more than once....oops seems I got it wrong or does that only apply to everyone who isnt living in Scotland ?
I've been a supporter of Independence since 1`967 when Winnie Ewing won Hamilton ,she was an inspiration.
Thats a long time to wait BUT not as long as 1955 which was when we last voted a Tory majority .
Maybe tory should be removed from our ballot papers ,we dont vote for them..same as we didn't Vote yes.Yet there they are ,every election! So if you dont mind ,and even if you do,we'll exercise our right to another referendum.
After all I was raised never to give up at the first hurdle

FarNorth Wed 11-May-22 17:07:32

A lot has changed since last time.

Wheniwasyourage Wed 11-May-22 16:59:23

Aveline, if we never get another referendum because the vote was No the last time, we shouldn't get a chance to vote for a new government because the vote was Tory last time. Aaargh!!

volver Wed 11-May-22 16:53:14

If it was down to me I wouldn't have another referendum yet. The next time we vote it has to be obvious that the answer will be Yes. Because we'll only get one more go in the foreseeable future. That said, whenever they ask me, my answer will be Yes.

The reason that the SNP exist is to work towards an independent Scotland. It's not sensible to ask them to stop doing that, it's why they were created and why they exist.

Aveline Wed 11-May-22 16:41:57

But we already voted on independence and said no. Why do it again? It'll only reopen the already nasty divide and the continuing uncertainty will lead to further economic stagnation. What if we vote no again? Will SNP keep trying? If so, why?

volver Wed 11-May-22 16:33:16

Voted ON independence, I should say.

volver Wed 11-May-22 16:31:01

This the constant chorus from people who think they are exposing the truth, that the majority of people do not vote SNP or for independence is getting very wearing.

More people voted for the SNP in first preference votes than voted for any other party. That's why they keep winning elections. There's a trend across social media right now to selectively pick on one aspect of the voting and try to pretend it changes things; it doesn't. The SNP keep winning elections. That's it.

And the last time we voted for independence, a majority didn't want it. That's the only time we've been asked. Polls and newspaper opinion pieces don't count. If we are asked again then we can say what the outcome is. Not until then.

Yogagran70 Wed 11-May-22 16:19:39

Cathy Mac
Totally agree with you, the fact is the majority of people in Scotland do NOT vote for SNP or independence, and that hasn’t changed up to now

Cathymac Wed 11-May-22 13:24:04

paddyann54

NHS Scotland is a totally seperate entity and has been since its inception .Of course we'll have the health service ,which in Scotland has more GP's Nurses and Dentists per head of population than any other part of the UK.
The problem we have philly is that our funding is linked to the NHS England and Wales by Barnet and our income has dropped in real terms by several billion over the past ten years .
Sadly devolution doesn't give us enough power or income to do what we need in all areas. As for school I think you'll find that most areas have had new schools ,my area has had 3 primaries and 2 secondaries and several refurbished in the past 10 years.
This was done WITHOUT the extortionate PFI funding used by Labour which will see councils paying for school AFTER they have been demolished .
The only way we can run this country how we want to ,i.e. in a manner that suits all levels of income from babies to pensioners is to get total control of our revenue .
Remember we work on less than half our revenue with Barnet ...and thats not counting taxables such as whisky that go through as ENGLISH exports.
This government while not perfect and due criticism as all governments are have been mitigating the bedroom tax for 70,000 tenants @ 75% of whom have disabled family who need space for equipment or extra help
.Has built 100,000 affordable homes 70,000 which are council .Councils who dont use the special funding for housing have it taken off them ...and its given to councils who do.In my area there are several hundred new build council houses It also gives free bus travel to all under 22 year olds ,saving parents money ,time ferrying kids around and old bangers on the roads...good for the environmentand has

Independence is normal ,having your next door neighbour run your country isn't,no business in the world would give their neighbour their income and let them divvy it up so why should country ?
Please take time to find out facts ,get in touch with Believe in Scotland on FB and they'll provide you with accurate funding /financial information for an independent Scotland .
I hope you can be persuaded to join the fight for our homeland

Paddyann…. As you say , Scotland’s NHS is devolved…. the Scottish Government decide what they wish to spend on it, so not quite sure how the UK Government comes into it.
The Scottish Government like to say that the GP numbers have gone up…. and the headcount may have gone up… but they are not always upfront about the fact that more are working part time so leaving significant gaps in the service.
The Scottish Government’s workforce planning for the NHS has been extremely poor. Nicola Sturgeon as Health Secretary reduced the number of medical places for Scottish students , so not enough graduates coming though to fill vacancies. She also cut the number of student nurses by 300 despite being warned by the Royal College of nursing it would mean future shortages.
We must accept responsibility for our own decisions on where the money is allocated if we want to be independent….

Zonne Wed 11-May-22 13:08:15

Whitewavemark2

A trade war makes so much sense given that the rise in the cost of living is higher than it has ever been in living memory.

Completely agree. But Johnson doesn’t care. All he wants is to appease enough right-wing swivel-eyed Brexiteer Tory MPs to keep him in power.

I suspect the answer to Wheniwasyourage’s question is, therefore: not if that ploy works.

It’s all so depressing and infuriating.

Wheniwasyourage Wed 11-May-22 12:49:09

Is he likely to go for a sail in the Irish Sea any time soon...?

Whitewavemark2 Wed 11-May-22 12:43:09

Don’t forget that Johnson said.

A line in the sea will be drawn over my dead body.

The DUP believed him.

Katie59 Wed 11-May-22 12:29:48

A solution would be for the UK to commit to equivalent standards, which would be a big help in many areas but that is not on the cards

nadateturbe Wed 11-May-22 12:20:39

Katie
Extra osts are being passed to customers. And also checking at ports is paid for by NI.
Sorry, out of time.....

MaizieD Wed 11-May-22 12:20:32

It would have been better to think it through before agreeing.

It would have been even better if some of those 17.4million Leave voters had done a bit of thinking before they put their cross against the 'Leave the EU' option.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 11-May-22 12:05:24

A trade war makes so much sense given that the rise in the cost of living is higher than it has ever been in living memory.

Zonne Wed 11-May-22 12:02:43

Add to that, if the Tories really do scrap the Protocol and thus trigger a trade war, the resultant mess will make the present situation, in all parts of the Uk, look like nirvana.

Katie59 Wed 11-May-22 12:02:34

Presumably goods produced in NI will have to comply with EU standards so won’t need checking, the UK plans to accept EU standards.

“Think it through from the beginning”
The UK has insisted on its own regulations not being regulated by EU, that’s fine when our rules are equivalent and agreed, some are now. But the UK has insisted to be able to “diverge” from those standards, the aviation industry is in chaos because the rules are different and not recognized.

In what way is the cost of living higher in NI ?

Whitewavemark2 Wed 11-May-22 12:02:28

The DUP had to be bribed to give May their support - we gave the £1.5bn.

MaizieD Wed 11-May-22 11:50:01

Zonne

nadateturbe because then you’d have to have a land border for goods moving between you and Ireland, which, as Katie59 has pointed is unconscionable.

Or, if the sea border which exists now were to be retained, but goods go through the Dublin port all you're doing is transferring the costs of the EU checks from NI to Ireland and adding extra costs (further to transport the goods) for the businesses supplying NI.

All in all it's a complete mess, as people were warning before the 2016 referendum. The Leave campaigners lied and lied about Brexit having any adverse effect on NI (well, they lied about its adverse effects on the whole of the UK, really), Remain voting NI was, of course, ignored as the Leave voting DUP gave May their support to keep her government going and the DUP believed the lies Johnson told them in the run up to signing the protocol.

Threats to suspend article 16 are ridiculous. It won't make the EU 'give in' on anything. If it is suspended it'll be a trade war with the EU and guess who'll win it?

I'm really sorry, nadertube but NI is in a pickle...

nadateturbe Wed 11-May-22 11:39:10

We will always have to check goods produced in NI which go to Republic.

My main point though is why should NI come out worse than everyone else. We will end up with job losses and much higher cost of living than the rest of the UK.

And even worse, now no solution is likely to suit both 'sides'. It would have been better to think it through before agreeing.

Wheniwasyourage Wed 11-May-22 11:27:13

stewaris

It was Nicola Sturgeon who was touting it as a support for the referendum but quickly changed her mind when it wasn't going down well on the doorsteps. At the last Scottish election the Greens candidates were elected on the list vote not first preference. I don't believe that MSPs who were not voted for on the preference vote should have ministerial positions no matter how junior they are.

I think you're confusing the voting systems used for different elections, stewaris. In general elections we vote by FPTP for a constituency MSP candidate and then for a party list so that there is a bit of evening up. Greens haven't stood in every constituency, but have always stood as a list, so it's not surprising that that is how they get MSPs. The argument that list MSPs are somehow "not as good" as constituency MSPs is getting a bit tired, as they are elected as well, just in a different way.

Katie59 Wed 11-May-22 10:56:29

If the destination of the goods is the ROI normal import checks are required entering the EU as they would be at Dover or elsewhere. Why is that a N/S border issue .

It’s a mess for sure, businesses will have to change it’s happened between Mainland UK and the EU also vice versa. Although goods coming into UK are still being waved through without checks. This is in itself is causing a problem, they have no import status

Zonne Wed 11-May-22 10:56:23

nadateturbe because then you’d have to have a land border for goods moving between you and Ireland, which, as Katie59 has pointed is unconscionable.

nadateturbe Wed 11-May-22 10:03:39

Katie59 I fail to see how sending goods from GB straight to Dublin port instead of Larne creates a N/S border.
Why are we, in NI, paying for EU checks?
When the grace period is up, it will cost even more. Businesses may pull out of NI completely.