Doodledog
AussieNanna I think that many people agree with you that people who medically and surgically transition are a different category from those who simply 'identify' as the opposite sex based on 'feelings' about 'gender'.
Many of us are sympathetic to those who have surgically transitioned, and are supportive of their right to live as they choose. What we are unhappy with, however, is the concept of 'gender' and we worry that if things continue as they are, anyone who does not conform to stereotypes of acceptable behaviour for their sex group will be assumed to be 'in the wrong body'. We also worry about the fact that female spaces exist for a reason, and if any man who says he is a woman can enter them, there is no point in their being there in the first place. Then there is the issue of language, which is being changed to eradicate women as a sex class. Interestingly, the word 'man' is not being removed from official documents.
Sorry if I am wide of the mark here, but I get the impression that you are not a TRA, but someone who is sensitive to the needs of those who (for want of a better term) refer to as genuine transpeople. You are not alone in that on here, but it seems as though wires have got crossed somewhere.
Thank you for your reasoned response.
I have not said anywhere that I agree with the extreme language sort of things or that any man (or woman in vice versa) can just say they identify as the other sex and go where they like.(why I agreed with the possibility someone else floated of registration or ID type cards)
so wires certainly crossed if anyone saw that in my posts
If many people agree that medically and surgically transitioned people (what I loosely called fully transitioned before) are a separate category, then that is good.
We are on the same page about something.
some posters seem to be denying any recognition of any transition at all though- and that is where I am not on the same page.