Maudi
Of course it's my view I've visited these places personally not just googled about them like some.
I was talking about Wheeler, subject of this thread, not you!
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Shows what the Tories really think about levelling-up.
The idea that they're sincerely interested in areas outside London and the South East is a joke - just hollow promises and soundbites that can't be measured.
Maudi
Of course it's my view I've visited these places personally not just googled about them like some.
I was talking about Wheeler, subject of this thread, not you!
The trouble with a lot of the seaside towns and I've visited plenty they have attracted the unemployed and undesirables because b and b owners and some smaller rundown hotels have hit hard times they have let out their rooms to these people on a permanent basis and people flock there because accommodation is cheaper.
Blimey, Well, of course people whose livelihood depends on running a B&B, will, in the lack of other visitors, accept anyone who can afford a room, but in fact, most of these B&Bs have contracts with the DWP, or Employment or whatever ministry deals with those unfortunate to be unemployed. They are the ones that send people to live by the sea, because it is cheaper than putting them up in B&B's close to where they have lived and away from any family or social support that may have helped them if they were nearby. Children of families dispatched to the seaside like this have their education disrupted and many people become mentally ill and 'undesirable' because of the enforced move and isolation from their usual support frame works
Since many seaside resorts are also areas of high unemployment, it also makes it much more difficult for enemployed people sent there, to get back into good employment, because they have been moved so far from places where they could have hoped to find employmet.
Great post M0nica.
MawtheMerrier
DiamondLily
She's apologised and said it doesn't reflect her actual view. ?
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/heather-wheeler-birmingham-blackpool-godawful-b2098701.htmlToo damn late.
Actually she is wrong anyway, I love Birmingham for its Botanic Gardens and parks, some very fine buildings, Symphony Hall, the orchestra, Birmingham Royal Ballet, the friendliness - where do I stop? I don’t know Blackpool but the warmth of the people in the NW is second to none in the U.K.
She needs more than a good talking to, patronising b***h
Totally agree. Birmingham has a superb parks, gardens and canalside with great eateries and nightlife. Symphony Hall is second to none - not just my view but Sir Simon Rattle has said so too. This woman has obviously never been to Birmingham or not recently anyway.
How disappointing that such a misinformed person has a Government role of any sort.
Why did she say it if it didn't reflect her actual view? Also why does she not know where she was? I think the Tories have lost the plot just now.
But logically it was A or B or C, so A and B were not in C, so it was about some places other than A or B.
So where?
Of course it reflects her views.
Blackpool does indeed suffer from the storm of bad policies superbly outlined by MOnica - but it's still not godawful.
Such patronizing language, clearly reflecting the MP's genuine view, or why say it?
Blinko
MawtheMerrier
DiamondLily
She's apologised and said it doesn't reflect her actual view. ?
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/heather-wheeler-birmingham-blackpool-godawful-b2098701.htmlToo damn late.
Actually she is wrong anyway, I love Birmingham for its Botanic Gardens and parks, some very fine buildings, Symphony Hall, the orchestra, Birmingham Royal Ballet, the friendliness - where do I stop? I don’t know Blackpool but the warmth of the people in the NW is second to none in the U.K.
She needs more than a good talking to, patronising b***hTotally agree. Birmingham has a superb parks, gardens and canalside with great eateries and nightlife. Symphony Hall is second to none - not just my view but Sir Simon Rattle has said so too. This woman has obviously never been to Birmingham or not recently anyway.
How disappointing that such a misinformed person has a Government role of any sort.
That includes 99% of the cabinet
Like just about everywhere else, both Blackpool and Birmingham have some nice parts and some unpleasant parts. Silly to generalise.
Why is levelling up seen as South vs North ? There are many extremely deprived areas along the south coast and many London boroughs rank high on the poverty/ deprivation index - seems like there’s no joined up thinking or any proper plan as to what levelling up actually means. But that doesn’t surprise me.
Why do places with really bad housing in parts of it always seem to have a Lord Mayor?
My tuppenceworth is that I have had short visits to both, and found them both to be friendly places. Every town or city has rundown bits, but also lovely bits. As far as I am concerned, a place where people will speak to you in the street is somewhere I will want to go back to. In the case of Blackpool, more than one person went out of their way to make sure we knew where we were going. Looking forward to my next visits to both!
Yes, the north v south thing is very annoying.
This is funny and exactly how it should be dealt with.
twitter.com/jessphillips/status/1535549778716770304
The Commonwealth Games begin in Birmingham on 28 July. The city stepped up after Durban pulled out as hosts bringing forward its bid to host the games in 2026.
In general, commonwealth sport is known to give a huge boost to GDP, provide employment increase tourism and give a threefold return on public investment. Aren’t these the things that Wheeler should be talking about instead of disparaging the city?
thecgf.com/news/new-report-reveals-commonwealth-games-consistently-provides-over-ps1-billion-boost-host-cities
M0nica
^The trouble with a lot of the seaside towns and I've visited plenty they have attracted the unemployed and undesirables because b and b owners and some smaller rundown hotels have hit hard times they have let out their rooms to these people on a permanent basis and people flock there because accommodation is cheaper.^
Blimey, Well, of course people whose livelihood depends on running a B&B, will, in the lack of other visitors, accept anyone who can afford a room, but in fact, most of these B&Bs have contracts with the DWP, or Employment or whatever ministry deals with those unfortunate to be unemployed. They are the ones that send people to live by the sea, because it is cheaper than putting them up in B&B's close to where they have lived and away from any family or social support that may have helped them if they were nearby. Children of families dispatched to the seaside like this have their education disrupted and many people become mentally ill and 'undesirable' because of the enforced move and isolation from their usual support frame works
Since many seaside resorts are also areas of high unemployment, it also makes it much more difficult for enemployed people sent there, to get back into good employment, because they have been moved so far from places where they could have hoped to find employmet.
Thanks MOnica, for posting an accurate summary of why people are living in B&B in run down seaside towns. They don’t go because rents are cheap Maudi. They’re sent because rents are cheap.
That’s also why many former mining and mill towns have growing populations of people seeking asylum. They’re shipped out to where rents are low.
Also, it is worth mentioning that this happens with children's homes too and also homes for people with disabilities who are in the care of the local authority and have no advocates or family to protect their needs. I think a lot of people are ignorant as to how poverty or lack of capacity through illness/disability/addiction (etc) affects your choices in life.
MayBee- I love your diagnosis of Integrity Bypass Syndrome!
I remember the young mayor of Blackpool talking about single unemployed folk being sent to be housed in his town from Cheltenham- sent with no support for Blackpool to look after.
Still, I suppose that it ensures that Cheltenham doesn't become "godawful ": heaven forbid!
I'm reminded of former Secretary of State David Howell, saying that fracking should take place in the desolate areas of the North East - no doubt that was his actual view at the time.
He later corrected himself to say he meant the North West where drilling was actually going on. He further corrected to say he shouldn't have mentioned any area at all! 
That's Baron Howell, of Guildford.
Tory politicians are in a bad place atm. The media is waiting to pounce on all of them and their unwisely elected leader. You get the feeling it is the "end of days" for this government and unless they do something about their great leader, it will get worse.
stardreame Why do places with really bad housing in parts of it always seem to have a Lord Mayor?
because a Conservative Government think that that is an excellent way of shrugging off their responisbility for the situation and blaming someone else. Such areas get so desperate for the help they are not getting they think that perhaps a bit of home rule will help. Once they have the Lord Mayor, the Conservatives shake off their responisbility and blame everything on the Lord Mayor.
I did go to Blackpool in the 80's and it was pretty rundown and awful. But, it might have improved since them obviously.
It depends where you go. We visited Blackpool years ago and it wasn't great but we didn't see all of Blackpool, only a small part.
If people visit some parts of Birmingham the would think it awful but they won't have seen the whole place. We shouldn't generalise.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.