SueDonim
And this. Imprisoned for a miscarriage. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-61798330
Guillermo Gallegos, one of the vice presidents of the national assembly, is staunchly anti-abortion.
He insists decriminalisation would never pass the first legislative hurdle, "even where the mother's life is at risk".
"In any case where that little creature still has life," he tells me, "then I lean towards saving it over saving the mother".
Why? Why is "that little creature's" life more important than the mother's?
... and who gave him the right to decide?
I think some of these men (and some women) have a God-complex.
Women's emancipation still has such a long way to go. We need to reach a point where men (unless they are personally affected by an abortion), don't get to make these decisions.
Or perhaps we need a national database of all men's DNA - and if they father a child and insist it's carried to term, they should then be financially responsible for that child - its education, health-care, you name it, until it can fend for itself. Clearly a ridiculous idea, but no more so that what is now being proposed in the US.
Men have go to be stopped from making these decisions and controlling women's lives.