Gransnet forums

News & politics

£102.4 million

(231 Posts)
Esspee Thu 30-Jun-22 06:50:16

Apparently that is the amount of our money spent on the Royal Family last year.
I would like to see an end to this anachronism. What about you?

Tish Fri 01-Jul-22 19:52:45

You are so right Casadon, not to mention all the Nightingale hospitals set up and never utilised and the ventilators purchased and never used as we simply never had enough trained staff to operate/monitor them. In future the Royal family will be pared down, Charles & William are already seeing to that but the Queen is worth every penny!

Glorianny Fri 01-Jul-22 19:05:02

Sorry I just don't see what is "mystical" or "magical" about a German family invited to take over the British monarchy because the ruling class feared Catholics on one side and the peasantry on the other.

Grany Fri 01-Jul-22 18:35:10

Shizam

Royalty is about mystique and magic going back a thousand years. That’s why they’re popular. It’s not the actual individuals who can be quite dull and ordinary, it’s that sprinkle of fairytale that makes them rather useful as heads of state. A lot of what they do and say drives me mad. But rather keep with this strange system than have the latest possibly dodgy ex-politician in the role. And it is an important role.

What RF that's what they call themselves got there through being the biggest thugs stole land that is their history and colonialism and slavery and no inheritance tax. People are wise to them now. They give their families grand homes all take do nothing to help people. Monarchy is there to support government and themselves that's all. These people are in public office for private gain.

A Head of State democraticly Elected could be in any profession and would be accountable to the people.

Our history the Royals did nothing to add to mankind the opposite

Shizam Fri 01-Jul-22 17:16:31

Royalty is about mystique and magic going back a thousand years. That’s why they’re popular. It’s not the actual individuals who can be quite dull and ordinary, it’s that sprinkle of fairytale that makes them rather useful as heads of state. A lot of what they do and say drives me mad. But rather keep with this strange system than have the latest possibly dodgy ex-politician in the role. And it is an important role.

Grany Fri 01-Jul-22 16:23:46

Well Said sazz1 and Bluecat smile

Bluecat Fri 01-Jul-22 16:18:07

The cost per head isn't the point. It's the way that public money is spent that is the real subject under discussion. Do we want to spend that amount on maintaining our head of state and their extended family? My feeling is that it would be perfectly possible to keep a democratically appointed head of state in a manner befitting the dignity of their office and at a fraction of the cost. One of the various royal homes would be sufficient for an official residence and they could have a salary on a par with the PM's salary. There would also be no need to provide for their adult children, grandchildren and sundry relatives.

However, I can't see that argument appealing to the present government, which managed to blow 37 billion pounds on a Test and Trace system that didn't work.

betts Fri 01-Jul-22 16:14:46

But look at all the great pictures you have.

sazz1 Fri 01-Jul-22 16:06:52

Royal family belongs in history. Also some of their weird traditions are crazy, nobody allowed to eat after queen has finished, people bowing and curtsey to another woman, granddaughters in law treated totally differently so unfair, grandsons treated differently too based on who was born first, etc etc. Harry and Megan had the right idea - move away as far as possible from these crazy power trip people. Just remember they don't possess magical powers so are just ordinary like us.

Grany Fri 01-Jul-22 16:05:06

Counting the cost of the monarchy a finacial report.

For many years now, the Royal Household has tried to claim that the monarchy is good value for money. Each year they produce an of finacial report, setting out what they’ve spent of taxpayers’ money. Every year the report is couched in spin and misses signifcant costs such as security, money spent by local councils and lost revenue from the Duchy’s

The coverage of royal costs is also led astray by wild claims about the money the monarchy is supposed to bring back into the country through tourism and trade. The reality is that the cost to the taxpayer runs into the hundreds of millions every year, while the tourism and trade revenue is a gment of the spin doctor’s imagination.

The British Head of State is incredibly expensive, at around £345m a year. That’s public money we could be spending on teachers, police or health services. This report shows that per head royals are the most expensive public of cials, costing around £19.1m a year each.

Because the royals can spend money at will and without the likelihood of being directly challenged they continue to abuse the system – we ask in this report if this abuse amounts to corruption.

GraceQuirrel Fri 01-Jul-22 15:35:33

GrannyGravy13

The Royals cost us £1.29 pence each last year, less than a cup of tea in your favourite tea shop, less than 1 litre of milk…

Exactly this! Do you think OP that your council tax is worth every penny because I certainly don’t.

GraceQuirrel Fri 01-Jul-22 15:34:27

Worth every penny! EU however is not.
www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1581125/brexit-news-bill-payments-uk-still-paying-eu-staff-pensions-betrayal-spt/amp

Petera Fri 01-Jul-22 15:34:09

Galaxy

Is Johnson the only option. No one told me that. Would you be happy with Andrew because it's an accident of birth that he wont be our next king.

Not the only accident. As has been commented before, from 1960 until 1982 we were one polo accident away from King Andrew.

maddyone Fri 01-Jul-22 15:21:12

grannie7

Janipans

The Royal family don’t own Windsor Castle.The only properties the Queen owns are Balmoral and Sandringham
and to the best of my knowledge has always used her own money to keep them in good order.
The rest of the properties are own by the state—-us

Oooh goody. I’ll book myself a little holiday staying in Windsor Castle then. That’ll be really nice. I wonder if I’ll get a butler in with the price? hmm

Callistemon21 Fri 01-Jul-22 15:05:36

grannie7

Very sorry I thought it was £1.29 a week.?

even more reason to keep them

?

I was thinking that is quite an expensive cup of coffee!!
And you can't buy one for £1.29

grannie7 Fri 01-Jul-22 15:00:48

Very sorry I thought it was £1.29 a week.?

even more reason to keep them

Callistemon21 Fri 01-Jul-22 14:58:31

£67.08 per person per year.

No - £1.29!

The total Sovereign Grant of £86.3million is equivalent to a cost of £1.29 per person in the UK. Last year, the total Sovereign Grant stood at £85.9million.

However, work on Buckingham Palace, which is undergoing a 10-year refurbishment plan, drove up total spending for the year to £102.4m - an increase of 17% on the previous year.

Money from leftover Sovereign Grant funds from previous years was used to meet the shortfall.

BBC News June 2022

Zoejory Fri 01-Jul-22 14:53:13

It costs every person in the UK £1.29 a year. Hardly a fortune.

I am quite happy to have a RF. Plenty of other things I'm not keen on but hey, you can't please all of the people all of the time.

susieconvento123 Fri 01-Jul-22 14:47:06

Well worth the money if only for the money tourist bring into the country. How boring it would be without these big events to look forward to .

grannie7 Fri 01-Jul-22 14:46:40

Janipans

The Royal family don’t own Windsor Castle.The only properties the Queen owns are Balmoral and Sandringham
and to the best of my knowledge has always used her own money to keep them in good order.
The rest of the properties are own by the state—-us

grannie7 Fri 01-Jul-22 14:39:40

£67.08 per person per year.
I wonder what the President of the USA costs per year.

At least we know our Royal family are not dipping into the till
not like some world leaders in the past/future.
The money brought in by tourists is way way above that figure and gives employment and profits to hundreds of employees and businesses.
It saddens me that people today just seem to want to forget and destroy the history of our nations.?

Anniebach Fri 01-Jul-22 14:39:25

Why the obsession with bowing ? No one has to bow, it’s choice, some do some don’t.

kjmpde Fri 01-Jul-22 14:35:18

the amount spent does not really bother me as I get more upset by subsidised food and drink for MPs and the house of Lords, HS2 etc. At least the Royal Family attracts visitors that bring in revenue for hoteliers, restaurants and shops.

MRGUDER Fri 01-Jul-22 14:21:26

Does anyone remember what happened when Russia got rid of their Royalty? And now look at what they've got - an elected leader (dictator) with huge amount of money stashed away.

Maybe I will apply to be Head of State.

Saggi Fri 01-Jul-22 14:21:13

They actually don’t cost as much as you’d think per head of population… so I don’t care! I’m a republican and wound never curtsy or bend the knee to anyone. They are an ‘anachronism of which we should be rid’ but it’s not the money thing…. for me it’s what they represent! ‘ Born into privelage’ upsets me , and they are head of that stuff and it’s self perpetrating nonsense. Meritocracy is the only way forward….they have no merit!

janipans Fri 01-Jul-22 13:56:47

No objections to Royal Family here, but, I just wish they would put their many assets to better use.
EG, After the fire at Windsor, the Queen opened Buckingham Palace to help raise funds to fix it. Very successful!
Why not do this more often and with many more Royal properties/gardens? No skin off their noses as they can't live in them all, (or even utilise the whole of them) all the time.
The money could boost charity funds - or why not support our NHS - also the envy of many countries - (and I don't mean treats/pay rises for the hard working staff, I mean state of the art equipment and/or re-opening local hospitals (so that staff and visitors don't have to travel for miles to treat/visit patients) and more medically supported care homes for the elderly (to free up beds in wards etc) The money could do so much good for this Country that the Royals serve ... but which also serves them.