When we are going through 'interesting times', I often think of what future schoolchildren will be taught about them (in the way we were taught about the causes of WW1 or the Industrial Revolution), and what topic headings they will come under. The people living through the Industrial Revolution won't have thought of it in those terms - they would just see another factory going up, or see neighbours leaving their farming jobs or cottage industries to move to other areas, and so on. The headings come later.
Brexit will obviously provide rich pickings for History, Economics, Politics, Sociology etc, and there will be huge scope for higher level syllabuses to ask for analysis of different viewpoints, voter behaviour, propaganda, economic impact, international relations and so on.
All of that is interesting, and whatever I think personally about it I can see that there are other perspectives and that time will add more exam question fodder, but what will the narrative be about UK politics between 2016 and 2024 (unless the GE comes early)? Will it be The Death of the Conservative Party, The Rise (or fall) of the Labour Party, The End of the UK, The Decline of Democracy, the British Revolution or Workers' Revolt, the End of Consensus, or what?
How do you think that this period will be taught in 2040?
How did you vote and why today
What colour car do you have or did you used to drive?


. I would like to see more modern and relevant texts (or works) being taught, but I also think that shared cultural references are A Good Thing. Obviously they could co-exist, but really only of there are half a dozen texts being studied, which (I think) only really happens at A level? If there is only space for a few texts then I don't know whether I would argue for George The Poet v WH Auden, or Douglas Stuart v Dickens. The former choices would probably change in a couple of years, meaning that pupils from different age groups would learn different texts (so no shared cultural references), but dead white men's perspectives on life are very limited (and limiting) and can put young people off reading in a way that more immediately relevant texts might not.)