Doodledog
^Glorianny^: No it points out the discrepancies in considering children unable to decide on one matter, but considering them competent on another, an example where a parent is not considered the best person to decide a child's treatment, something many on these threads insist is paramount, and the lack of proper treatment for a group of children who need help.
Mermaids simply fill a gap which has been left. If the gap wasn't there they wouldn't exist. Right or wrong isn't actually of prime importance.
You are not comparing like with like. Children who are sexually active (not ideal, but it happens) are safer if they are protected from pregnancy, and when speaking to a sexual health professional can also learn about how to protect themselves from STIs and potentially about how to escape from exploitative situations. The point is that as well as the contraception there is communication.
Children who are confused about so-called 'gender' issues are given none of this. They may well agree to the guidelines, but as minors they are not legally able to do so.
Also, it is you who is considering children competent in one area, equating it with another, and then extrapolating from that that so are others. Who has said that they approve of children being given contraceptives? Or are you leaping to your own conclusions there? Some posters may be in favour, some may not, others will feel that the situation is nuanced.
Nobody has argued that there should not be unbiased medical/psychological help available to confused children, but to say that because there isn't, it is ok for places like Mermaids to act on their own volition is, to take another two random things and create a spurious link, like saying that because there is not enough help for mental health issues, mind-altering drugs should be available online and distributed by lottery-funded organisations who claim good intentions and that they are simply 'plugging a gap'.
Right or wrong is of prime importance - I beg to differ.
I am actually comparing like with like. That is the ability of teenage children to access and receive medical advice without the consent or knowledge of their parents. However the anti-trans body of posters persist in considering trans as something different. It isn't, it is one of the problems which may present in the teenagers years, and which some teens may be completely supported through by their families, but which many may not. All children are better served if they are given proper medical support and counselling for their problems. Unfortunately for trans children there is little or no support. As I said Mermaids only exists because of this. That anyone would seek to shut down something and leave children exposed to just seeking on-line support, from disreputable suppliers who don't impose any restrictions, provide no guidelines, and are only interested in supplying products and drugs purely for profit, I find totally incomprehensible. I can only hope that the condemnation comes from a lack of real knowledge about the dangers out there. But whatever the reason completely condemning Mermaids, whilst failing to supply a proper gender support service, could only result in more harm to children, not less.
Right or wrong isn't of prime importance because it is better to have some support which may help some children to deal with their fears and problems, than to have nothing at all, which leaves them vulnerable and liable to undertake more risky procedures. Try reading about what trans children have done. Binding with gaffer tape and sharing drugs are just two of the less risky behaviours that they take up.