Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should the Coronation be “slimmed down”?

(213 Posts)
BigBertha1 Sun 09-Oct-22 12:52:11

What would slimmed down look like? A quick trip to the Abbey and a cold collation at Buck House for salaried royals only? What? Who? When?

Silvergirl Sun 09-Oct-22 12:48:20

It should be massively slimmed down given the current financial crisis.

IrishDancing Sun 09-Oct-22 12:44:38

Yes, I think it should, and will, be slimmed down. General slimming down has begun already and I think it will continue.

MaizieD Sun 09-Oct-22 12:44:11

I think a 'big' coronation would give a boost to the economy that might be desperately needed by next year. Just about everything needed to be purchased for the event will involve businesses of some kind or another and most of the money involved will end up being taxed back to the Treasury.

OTOH, I can see that it could be bad optics...

I'm on the fence...

Charleygirl5 Sun 09-Oct-22 12:42:23

Even cutting it down to 6K invited guests are far too many.
I am a fan of the Royal family but I do not want to see it on every TV channel known to man repeating itself ad infinitum.

At least Charles is in favour of slimming it down.

silverlining48 Sun 09-Oct-22 12:35:37

It should be slimmed down.

Parsley3 Sun 09-Oct-22 12:33:46

Will Charles be anointed to show that he is chosen by God? I have read that this symbolic element was important to the late Queen.

ParlorGames Sun 09-Oct-22 12:27:45

The queen had her coronation in the post-war years and I imagine the general opinion was that it would uplift people after so much hardship - not sure we. should compare the pandemic to WW2 though.
Everyone is feeling the squeeze now so perhaps some savings should be made although I do understand that certain elements of the coronation would still need to be observed.

Grannynannywanny Sun 09-Oct-22 12:27:04

I had a “need to go to Specsavers” moment there. I thought it said Coronation St. I say yes to both options!

Calendargirl Sun 09-Oct-22 12:26:00

Yes, it should be ‘slimmed down’.

The Queen’s funeral was a great event, marking the life of our oldest and longest lived monarch.

But the future of the Monarchy needs to move on from Elizabeth’s long reign, and a smaller, less ostentatious Coronation is where it needs to start, which is what Charles and William will have concluded I’m sure.

A certain amount of pomp and tradition, but more in keeping with a new era.

I am in favour of the Monarchy, btw.

Witzend Sun 09-Oct-22 12:22:09

After the brilliantly organised funeral, I did wonder how, if such things can be so incredibly well organised here, how come too many other things are a shambles?

lemsip Sun 09-Oct-22 12:21:15

YES! The coronation needs to be very Slim!

sarahcyn Sun 09-Oct-22 12:18:43

A year ago I would have said definitely we do not want a coronation for Charles anything like Elizabeth’s.
But looking at how uplifting for people across the nation Elizabeth’s funeral was - I’m starting to think differently. I wonder if actually the coronation might be an opportunity to celebrate what Britain does best, solidarity with the Commonwealth, diversity and whatnot.
I don’t know - just feeling it could be a chance for cheering us up - blending some amazing traditions which we only see once in a lifetime with a forward looking spirit - oh I don’t know.
I’d be very interested in what others think.