MaizieD
ronib
Do you have any proof to back up your costings of agency staff growstuff?
Well so what if the prime minister can stay in a country house at weekends, etc the responsibility of running the entire country is much greater than running the flagging health service.
I found this from 2015. Admittedly produced by an agency...
www.care101.co.uk/Documents/101-Agency-vs-Permanent-Costs.pdf
I think their argument might fall somewhat if the agency staff are covering for staff absence for sickness, as the NHS will still be paying some costs for that staff member.
And, I understand that a cap was placed on payments to agency staff in 2019.
You're right that it's not always an either/or situation, if it's a sickness cover. However, the alternative is to employ excess staff and run the risk of staff not being fully employed.
When a unit is to be reorganised (as happens because the government directs it), staff begin to leave, there's a ban on new recruitment and nobody wants to work somewhere where they're going to be made redundant. The staff who remain have to do extra shifts, so the system is already under pressure. If somebody goes off sick or takes holiday entitlement, a gap will need filling and it's cheaper (although not necessarily better) to use an agency.